Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-23 Thread Mark Andrews
There is way too much misinformation here. named probes the kernel to work out if it supports IPv6 or not. named -4 turns off IPv6 so there is no need to disable it at compile time. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117,

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-22 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Diane Bruce wrote: | | why don't we want IPv6 enabled by default on new BIND installations? | | It has to do with whether or not IPv6 support is compiled into the | FreeBSD base system which is compiling BIND. If the configure option ... If I'm still alive when IPv6 is

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:02:08 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Diane Bruce wrote: | | why don't we want IPv6 enabled by default on new BIND installations? | | It has to do with whether or not IPv6 support is compiled into the | FreeBSD base system which is

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-22 Thread Doug Barton
On 9/22/2010 6:50 AM, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:02:08 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Can't we just do what lib/bind/config.mk already does? Since I've already answered this twice in the same thread, I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine why I will

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-22 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Sep 21, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Diane Bruce wrote: [ ... ] Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: If I'm still alive when IPv6 is the norm and IPv4 is the exception, I promise to give it another look. :) IPv6 is more prevalent than you think. I can't understand the illogic of turning it

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-22 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 22/09/2010 20:01:48, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi-- On Sep 21, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Diane Bruce wrote: [ ... ] Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: If I'm still alive when IPv6 is the norm and IPv4 is the exception, I promise to give it another look. :) IPv6 is more prevalent than you

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Kamichoff
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:34:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: | Although, that still does beg the question, No, it doesn't. :) See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beg_the_question http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beg_the_question#Modern_usage | why don't we want IPv6 enabled by default on new BIND

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-21 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/21/2010 4:43 AM, Mark Kamichoff wrote: | On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:34:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: | | Although, that still does beg the question, | | No, it doesn't. :) See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beg_the_question | |

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-21 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:06:43 -0700 From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/21/2010 4:43 AM, Mark Kamichoff wrote: | On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:34:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: | | Although,

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 9/21/2010 12:15 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: I'd suggest looking at it when IPv6 becomes a standard part of system software and routing . That will happen long before IPv4 becomes an exception. I think you missed the bit where I pointed out that the current configuration works in all modern

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-21 Thread Diane Bruce
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:06:43 -0700 From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/21/2010 4:43 AM, Mark Kamichoff wrote: | On

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-20 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/19/2010 11:55 AM, Mark Kamichoff wrote: | Well, you can safely ignore this! I realized afterwards that | '--disable-ipv6' just disables the default use of IPv6 in BIND, it | doesn't completely disable the protocol. Turns out I was querying

BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-19 Thread Mark Kamichoff
Hi - I just noticed (well, via a discussion in #ipv6 on freenode) that the default configure arguments for BIND9 on 8.1 include '--disable-ipv6'. % grep CONFIGARGS /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/Makefile CONFIGARGS='--prefix=/usr' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man'

Re: BIND9 built w/--disable-ipv6 on 8.1-STABLE

2010-09-19 Thread Mark Kamichoff
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 02:37:21PM -0400, Mark Kamichoff wrote: I just noticed (well, via a discussion in #ipv6 on freenode) that the default configure arguments for BIND9 on 8.1 include '--disable-ipv6'. % grep CONFIGARGS /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/Makefile CONFIGARGS='--prefix=/usr'