On 10/11/2012 02:45, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buissonclbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools,
but
the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers,
and
FreeBSD
On 10/11/2012 02:52, Glen Barber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:34:56AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
FWIW, you can compile the svn binary elsewhere, statically linked, and
save the dependency problem by copying the resulting binary around.
Lucky people who have an elsewhere.
And the
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
I understood that. At a time I have been in that situation, but to be there I
had to sell the use of FreeBSD at my $WORK, and started with a single
machine
and limited ressources. So the existence of a cluster even for people
On 10/11/2012 13:34, Glen Barber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
I understood that. At a time I have been in that situation, but to be there I
had to sell the use of FreeBSD at my $WORK, and started with a single machine
and limited ressources. So the
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
I do not see a real interest of filling a PR for cvsup1.fr. I have just done
the
same test with the same result with cvsup5.de and cvsup10.us.
www.mavetju.org/unix/freebsd-mirrors/ have all cvsup mirrors in red, and IIRC
On 10/08/2012 22:16, Jakub Lach wrote:
FreeBSD/arm and FreeBSD/mips will be added soon!.
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/
As the last snapshot is from October 6, I infer that they use cvs/cvsup, with
the svn to cvs gateway down since this date ..
Claude Buisson
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-snapshots
Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote
in 1349873186577-5750838.p...@n5.nabble.com:
ja Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
ja
ja But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
ja
ja And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
Migrating from CVS
On 10/10/2012 16:07, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Jakub Lachjakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote
in1349873186577-5750838.p...@n5.nabble.com:
ja Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
ja
ja But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
ja
ja And for the record, they are
Thanks for information, and especially thanks for
providing snapshots- they are my primary source
(and for many) for fresh FreeBSD isos.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-snapshots-tp5749922p5750927.html
Sent from the freebsd
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote:
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
Honestly, my message was also a test about the current state of the svn to cvs
gateway. Is it down without nobody taking care ? or
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
As an addon, according to lists.freebsd.org, svn-ports have not been
updated since more than a day...
This is an unrelated problem, caused by machine upgrades/moves at our
main data center.
- the recently created
Sorry if I've misunderstood you, but how making second
unofficial repository forwards the case of having official one?
On the side, having void link on main page, like now is
worst option.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote:
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
Honestly, my message was also a test about the current
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
I know, but:
- there are no more official snapshots on freebsd.org
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a
previous reply), the end goal is
On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote:
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a
previous reply), the end goal is official snapshots.
I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special about _your_
snapshots that they'll become official - why not just make
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:47:32AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote:
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a
previous reply), the end goal is official snapshots.
I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special about
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:33:57 +0200, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr
wrote:
- I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of,
Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space).
I
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:02:40AM +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
- I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of,
Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space).
I think it is rather significant:
FWIW, you can compile the svn binary elsewhere, statically
On 10/11/2012 01:33, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buissonclbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
On 10/10/2012 14:46, Jakub Lach wrote:
Any questions and suggestions are welcome. Contact h...@freebsd.org.
But good catch, if your reasoning is indeed correct.
Honestly,
On 10/11/2012 01:40, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:04:22PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
And for the record, they are NOT official snapshots.
I know, but:
- there are no more official snapshots on freebsd.org
This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned
On 10/11/2012 02:09, Glen Barber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:02:40AM +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
- I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of,
Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space).
I think it is rather significant:
FWIW, you can compile
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools,
but
the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers,
and
FreeBSD developers are required to keep their development
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:28:05AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
- the recently created snapshots.glenbarber.us is much more limited
May I ask what it is that is limiting? If there is some limitation, I
certainly will do what I can to address it.
Right now, the limitations I am already
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:34:56AM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
FWIW, you can compile the svn binary elsewhere, statically linked, and
save the dependency problem by copying the resulting binary around.
Lucky people who have an elsewhere.
And the static binary is as much bloated than
Quoth Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buisson clbuis...@orange.fr wrote:
I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools,
but
the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers,
and
FreeBSD
FreeBSD/arm and FreeBSD/mips will be added soon!.
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-snapshots-tp5749922p5750424.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com
great!
thanks very much!
2012/10/9 Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl
FreeBSD/arm and FreeBSD/mips will be added soon!.
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-CURRENT-and-9-STABLE-snapshots
Would be better if there is ARM and MIPS build too since we already have
ARMV6 branch merged to HEAD
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:29:45PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
It would be nice to have them hosted on FreeBSD.org site as official
source.
I agree 100%.
Unofficial snapshots can be downloaded from
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/ for a long time (bootonly.iso too)
I am not
Am 10/06/12 03:32, schrieb Bruce Cran:
On 05/10/2012 15:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Unofficial snapshots can be downloaded from
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/ for a long time
(bootonly.iso too)
I'm baffled as to why those aren't just made official.
Since a couple of time for
Hi,
A number of FreeBSD users have displayed interest in the availability
and testing of -STABLE and -CURRENT snapshot releases.
I have been working on generating snapshots regularly, and now would
like to announce their availability for those interested in testing.
Please note, as always with
On 2012/10/05 21:51, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
A number of FreeBSD users have displayed interest in the availability
and testing of -STABLE and -CURRENT snapshot releases.
I have been working on generating snapshots regularly, and now would
like to announce their availability for those
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:56:39PM +0800, Mike Manilone wrote:
A number of FreeBSD users have displayed interest in the availability
and testing of -STABLE and -CURRENT snapshot releases.
Good idea! :-)
Could it be used in freebsd-update?
Currently, no. The freebsd-update(8) utility is
Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
A number of FreeBSD users have displayed interest in the availability
and testing of -STABLE and -CURRENT snapshot releases.
I have been working on generating snapshots regularly, and now would
like to announce their availability for those interested in testing.
Please
On 05/10/2012 15:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Unofficial snapshots can be downloaded from
https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/ for a long time
(bootonly.iso too)
I'm baffled as to why those aren't just made official.
--
Bruce Cran
___
36 matches
Mail list logo
