On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:01:50PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
Is the 'VM/VFS overruns' item still a problem? That was likely fixed a
couple of months ago. If not then it's definitely something that I'll
track for the 6.1 release.
I'll retest that one, but it wasn't fixed yet in
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:40:42AM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
Linking against -lthr (or even -lc_r!) instead of -lpthread solves gdb
The program no longer exists. problem for me on RELENG_6.
Well, yes, but that's not the same. While running on M:N KSE, all sorts
of locking needs to be correct,
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
Linking against -lthr (or even -lc_r!) instead of -lpthread solves gdb
The program no longer exists. problem for me on RELENG_6.
Well, yes, but that's not the same. While running on M:N KSE, all sorts
of locking needs to
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:33:21PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
Linking against -lthr (or even -lc_r!) instead of -lpthread solves gdb
The program no longer exists. problem for me on RELENG_6.
Well, yes, but that's not
Marc Olzheim wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:33:21PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:29:00PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
Linking against -lthr (or even -lc_r!) instead of -lpthread solves gdb
The program no longer exists. problem for me on RELENG_6.
Well, yes, but
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Scott Long wrote:
There is little difference between 1:1 and M:N from the application's
point of view. Both will allow multiple application threads to run
concurrently on multiple CPUs, and both will allow other process threads
to run when the current thread blocks in
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:05:07PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Everyone is still welcome to update their sources on the RELENG_6_0
branch and provide feedback for the next 48 hours or so. The release
will likely be announced by the end of the weekend or early next
week, at the latest.
Marc Olzheim wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:05:07PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Everyone is still welcome to update their sources on the RELENG_6_0
branch and provide feedback for the next 48 hours or so. The release
will likely be announced by the end of the weekend or early next
week, at
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:36:42AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Anyone having updates for my showstopper page, please, notify me...
http://www.stack.nl/%7Emarcolz/FreeBSD/showstoppers.html
The pty problem is likely a side effect of known locking problems with
ttys and ptys in general. This
The ACPI+sio problem is known. I have a motherboard with a similar
problem, though a different brand than yours. I solved it by removing
the ACPI attachment from the sio code. The better solution is to allow
loader hints to override ACPI hints. I tried talking to John Baldwin
about
Warner Losh wrote:
The ACPI+sio problem is known. I have a motherboard with a similar
problem, though a different brand than yours. I solved it by removing
the ACPI attachment from the sio code. The better solution is to allow
loader hints to override ACPI hints. I tried talking to John
From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:42:32 -0700
Warner Losh wrote:
The ACPI+sio problem is known. I have a motherboard with a similar
problem, though a different brand than yours. I solved it by removing
the ACPI attachment
Marc Olzheim wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:36:42AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Anyone having updates for my showstopper page, please, notify me...
http://www.stack.nl/%7Emarcolz/FreeBSD/showstoppers.html
The pty problem is likely a side effect of known locking problems with
ttys and ptys
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Warner Losh wrote:
From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:42:32 -0700
Warner Losh wrote:
The ACPI+sio problem is known. I have a motherboard with a similar
problem, though a different brand than yours. I
From: Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:48:49 -0700 (MST)
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Warner Losh wrote:
From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:42:32 -0700
Warner Losh
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Marc Olzheim wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:05:07PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Everyone is still welcome to update their sources on the RELENG_6_0
branch and provide feedback for the next 48 hours or so. The release
will likely be announced by the end of the weekend
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:18:09PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
Everyone is still welcome to update their sources on the RELENG_6_0
branch and provide feedback for the next 48 hours or so. The release
will likely be announced by the end of the weekend or early next
week, at the
On 10/30/05, Bryan Fullerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have raised this issue in the past, but no one responded.
Did you submit a PR?
Bryan
No I didn't. There was no response so I figured maybe I was the only
one affected.
Jiawei
--
Without the userland, the kernel is useless.
On 10/29/05, Jung-uk Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was that working X11 X.Org or XFree86? Older releases contains
XFree86 and 6.0 contains X.Org. You can find both as a FreeBSD port
under x11-servers category. Give XFree86 a try, maybe it is better
for You.
Or xorg-server-snap, maybe...
On 10/29/05, Jiawei Ye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is in sis.ko. Delete this file (disabling dri/drm only in
xorg.conf is not useful), and Xorg will work again.
I have raised this issue in the past, but no one responded.
Did you submit a PR?
Bryan
I'm happy to hear that many bugs were fixed. :)
But speedtouch usb modem still doesn't work with betas and last rc1.
I submitted this some month ago:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=usb/83504
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 10/27/05, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well enough
that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to 6.0-RELEASE. Everyone
that we have talked to has applauded the stability and functionality of
the system, so we
Felipe openglx wrote:
On 10/27/05, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well enough
that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to 6.0-RELEASE. Everyone
that we have talked to has applauded the stability and functionality of
On 10/28/05, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll need to work with the X11 developers. X is only something that
FreeBSD includes as a 3rd party package, it's not something that we
work on as part of the OS.
That's odd, because X11 always worked on that machine, on any linux
distro and
Felipe openglx wrote:
On 10/28/05, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll need to work with the X11 developers. X is only something that
FreeBSD includes as a 3rd party package, it's not something that we
work on as part of the OS.
That's odd, because X11 always worked on that
On Friday 28 October 2005 12:06 pm, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Felipe openglx wrote:
On 10/28/05, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll need to work with the X11 developers. X is only something
that FreeBSD includes as a 3rd party package, it's not something
that we work on as part of the
All,
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well enough
that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to 6.0-RELEASE. Everyone
that we have talked to has applauded the stability and functionality of
the system, so we are really pleased and really eager to wrap it up and
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well
enough that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to
6.0-RELEASE. Everyone that we have talked to has applauded the
stability and functionality of the system, so we are really pleased and
really eager to wrap it up and get
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:09:36 +0200
Felipe Alfaro Solana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well
enough that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to
6.0-RELEASE. Everyone that we have talked to has applauded the
stability and
Marcin Jessa wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:09:36 +0200
Felipe Alfaro Solana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well
enough that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to
6.0-RELEASE. Everyone that we have talked to has applauded the
On 27/10/2005, at 21:12, Marcin Jessa wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:09:36 +0200
Felipe Alfaro Solana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well
enough that we've decided to skip RC2 and go straight to
6.0-RELEASE. Everyone that we have talked
What about Gleb Smirnoff NFS locking leak patch ? I put it on
production, everything works just fine. The question is: this
patch will be merged to main source tree for 6.0-RELEASE ?
Scott Long wrote:
SL Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well enough
SL that we've
Vladimir Sharun wrote:
What about Gleb Smirnoff NFS locking leak patch ? I put it on
production, everything works just fine. The question is: this
patch will be merged to main source tree for 6.0-RELEASE ?
Scott Long wrote:
SL Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:43:35PM +0300, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
What about Gleb Smirnoff NFS locking leak patch ? I put it on
production, everything works just fine. The question is: this
patch will be merged to main source tree for 6.0-RELEASE ?
It already was.
Kris
pgpDf8ksiSV4z.pgp
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:21:51 +0200
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/10/2005, at 21:12, Marcin Jessa wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:09:36 +0200
Felipe Alfaro Solana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to let everyone know that the testing on RC1 has gone well
enough that
35 matches
Mail list logo
