Re: HEADS UP: databases/postgresql72 is dying

2004-11-23 Thread Palle Girgensohn
--On lördag, november 06, 2004 20.39.23 +0300 Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Sebastian B?ck wrote: SB> Ade Lovett wrote: SB> > FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now tagged SB> > databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.

Re: HEADS UP: databases/postgresql72 is dying

2004-11-06 Thread Ade Lovett
Sebastian Böck wrote: Have you considered that 7.2 is the last Version that doesn't have schemas. Out there may be some / are lot of applications that depend on this behaviour. I've considered lots of things. Nothing is *forcing* you to upgrade, and there will be packages for this port all the way

Re: HEADS UP: databases/postgresql72 is dying

2004-11-06 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Sebastian B?ck wrote: SB> Ade Lovett wrote: SB> > FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now tagged SB> > databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.2.5) as DEPRECATED, with it SB> > being removed from the tree on or about 1st January 2005.

Re: HEADS UP: databases/postgresql72 is dying

2004-11-06 Thread Sebastian Böck
Ade Lovett wrote: FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now tagged databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.2.5) as DEPRECATED, with it being removed from the tree on or about 1st January 2005. You are *strongly* urged to upgrade to either 7.3.x or 7.4.x Have you consi

HEADS UP: databases/postgresql72 is dying

2004-11-05 Thread Ade Lovett
FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now tagged databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.2.5) as DEPRECATED, with it being removed from the tree on or about 1st January 2005. You are *strongly* urged to upgrade to either 7.3.x or 7.4.x As previously stated (on ports@)