Re: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

2013-02-11 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 10:16 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: For those that may have run across the story on Slashdot about this NIC, here is our statement: Recently there were a few stories published, based on a blog post by an end-user, suggesting specific network packets may cause the IntelĀ®

Re: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

2013-02-09 Thread Parv
in message a18965a6-8d17-4919-9947-fe43d2503...@gsoft.com.au, wrote Daniel O'Connor thusly... On 09/02/2013, at 4:46, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: recommends contacting your motherboard manufacturer if you have continued concerns or questions whether your products are impacted.

Re: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

2013-02-09 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 09/02/2013, at 20:42, Parv p...@pair.com wrote: Contact your motherboard manufacturer is much more time consuming than Run sysctl... | grep foo | awk ... to see if your system is affected. Gift^WStraight from horse's mouth ... http://blog.krisk.org/2013/02/packets-of-death.html I've

Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

2013-02-08 Thread Jack Vogel
For those that may have run across the story on Slashdot about this NIC, here is our statement: Recently there were a few stories published, based on a blog post by an end-user, suggesting specific network packets may cause the IntelĀ® 82574L Gigabit Ethernet Controller to become unresponsive

Re: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot

2013-02-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 09/02/2013, at 4:46, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: recommends contacting your motherboard manufacturer if you have continued concerns or questions whether your products are impacted. Here is the link: