Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
My rc.conf is something like this:
#
# For now, force ath0 to use the same MAC address as xl0.
# This works around a bug where lagg is unable to set the
# MAC address of the underlying wlan0 interface.
#
ifconfig_ath0=ether 01:02:03:04:05:06
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, David DeSimone wrote:
Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote:
My rc.conf is something like this:
#
# For now, force ath0 to use the same MAC address as xl0.
# This works around a bug where lagg is unable to set the
# MAC address of the underlying wlan0 interface.
#
On 09/12/2012 10:51 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x.
You're right, it seems to be pointing to
On 11/09/2012 22:03, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
/etc/rc.conf
On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org
mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org
mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org
wrote:
On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org
mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x.
You're right, it seems to be pointing to the igb(4) driver in 9.x
compared to 9.0.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x.
You're
igb+lagg worked for us on 8.3. Haven't tried it since moving to 9.0
and 9-STABLE on those three boxes.
igb+lagg doesn't work for him on 9.0. Although, I don't recall if
non-LACP options were tried earlier in this thread, or if it's just
the LACP mode that's failing. If one mode
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
/etc/rc.conf
---
ifconfig_igb0=inet
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
/etc/rc.conf
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work properly in lagg.
To be sure I started from scratch from a 9.0 release with nothing but:
/etc/rc.conf
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
cloned_interfaces=lagg0
ifconfig_lagg0=laggproto lacp laggport igb1 laggport igb2 laggport igb3
192.168.x.x/24
sshd_enable=YES
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
