On 09/19/2010 18:33, Dan Mack wrote:
> But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15 build of
> FreeBSD, correct?
Yes
> But the problem scenario would be when I've upgraded by root pool to v15 and
> I attempt to boot it with v14 boot loader. At least that is what I think ..
Thanks for the confirmation. This worked fine and I did notice that "zpool
upgrade zroot" was nice enough to emit the reminder:
gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 da0
which is slightly different than the recipe given in /usr/src/UPDATING:
"gpart bootcode -p /boot/g
On 19/09/2010 17:36:01, Dan Mack wrote:
> But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15
> build of FreeBSD, correct? But the problem scenario would be when
> I've upgraded my root pool to v15 and I attempt to boot it with v14
> boot loader. At least that is what I think ...
But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15 build of
FreeBSD, correct? But the problem scenario would be when I've upgraded by
root pool to v15 and I attempt to boot it with v14 boot loader. At least that
is what I think ...
I guess what I'm getting at is ... you should
But I should be able to boot my ZFSv14 root pool using the ZFSv15 build of
FreeBSD, correct? But the problem scenario would be when I've upgraded my
root pool to v15 and I attempt to boot it with v14 boot loader. At least that
is what I think ...
I guess what I'm getting at is ... you shoul
On Sep 17, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Martin Matuska wrote:
>
>> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
>>
>> Thanks for the notice.
>>
>> Dňa 15. 9. 2010 21:12, Xin LI wrote / napísal(a):
>>> On 2010/09/15 11:30, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 02:07 PM
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:37:50AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Martin Matuska wrote:
>
> > I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
> >
> > Thanks for the notice.
> >
> > Dňa 15. 9. 2010 21:12, Xin LI wrote / napísal(a):
> >> On 2010/09/15 11:30, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Sep 16, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Martin Matuska wrote:
> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
>
> Thanks for the notice.
>
> Dňa 15. 9. 2010 21:12, Xin LI wrote / napísal(a):
>> On 2010/09/15 11:30, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>> At 02:07 PM 9/15/2010, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
First of all, a great t
On 09/16/2010 17:18, jhell wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
caveats to upgrading ?
Do I just do
zpool upgrade -a
zfs upgrade -a
or are there any extra steps ?
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bootcode better tha
Dont forget to read the general "ZFS notes" section in UPDATING:
ZFS notes
-
When upgrading the boot ZFS pool to a new version, always follow
these two steps:
1.) recompile and reinstall the ZFS boot loader and boot block
(this is part of "make buildworld" and "make installworld")
2.) u
At 11:18 AM 9/16/2010, jhell wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
> caveats to upgrading ?
>
> Do I just do
>
> zpool upgrade -a
> zfs upgrade -a
>
> or are there any extra steps ?
>
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bo
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
> caveats to upgrading ?
>
> Do I just do
>
> zpool upgrade -a
> zfs upgrade -a
>
> or are there any extra steps ?
>
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bootcode better than you. So if you
Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
caveats to upgrading ?
Do I just do
zpool upgrade -a
zfs upgrade -a
or are there any extra steps ?
---Mike
Mike Tancsa,
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:42:36 +0200, Guido Falsi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> >> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688
On 09/16/10 12:42, Guido Falsi wrote:
Related to this, I have a question.
Is it convenient to put databases on a compresed filesystem? Apart from
the space advantage, does it give any speed advantage/penalty?
It depends on what you do. It will not save you memory usage either
since data need
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> >> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the notice.
> >
> > Just a thank you m
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
>>
>> Thanks for the notice.
>
> Just a thank you message for the v15 development, MFS and this fast
> fix. Maybe this is just nois
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
>
> Thanks for the notice.
Just a thank you message for the v15 development, MFS and this fast
fix. Maybe this is just noise on the lists, but I think that too
little thanks get to the Free
I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
Thanks for the notice.
Dňa 15. 9. 2010 21:12, Xin LI wrote / napísal(a):
> On 2010/09/15 11:30, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> At 02:07 PM 9/15/2010, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>>> First of all, a great thanks to mm@ and pjd@ for the excellent work on
>>> ZFS in FreeBS
Quoth Pascal Stumpf on Wednesday, 15 September 2010:
> First of all, a great thanks to mm@ and pjd@ for the excellent work on
> ZFS in FreeBSD. :) And especially for the MFC of v15 a few hours ago.
>
> Unfortunately, buildworld currently fails (8-STABLE amd64) when linking
> libzfs with an »unde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/15 11:30, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 02:07 PM 9/15/2010, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>> First of all, a great thanks to mm@ and pjd@ for the excellent work on
>> ZFS in FreeBSD. :) And especially for the MFC of v15 a few hours ago.
>
[...]
> here t
At 02:07 PM 9/15/2010, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
First of all, a great thanks to mm@ and pjd@ for the excellent work on
ZFS in FreeBSD. :) And especially for the MFC of v15 a few hours ago.
Yes, thats a LOT of fixes! Some look very interesting indeed :)
8632:36ef517870a3
6798384 It can take a
First of all, a great thanks to mm@ and pjd@ for the excellent work on
ZFS in FreeBSD. :) And especially for the MFC of v15 a few hours ago.
Unfortunately, buildworld currently fails (8-STABLE amd64) when linking
libzfs with an »undefined reference to getmntent« error. Can anyone else
confirm?
23 matches
Mail list logo
