Peter Jeremy wrote:
Real DEC Tulip cards do this when running Tru64 as well. My guess is that
it's a bug in the NIC. (And it looks like AMDtek have copied it).
Peter, Warner, Stefan, et al.:
I just found this thread on the mailing list, and am responding to it, a year
later :) I also believe
At 2005-01-24 00:00:32+, Net Virtual Mailing Lists writes:
Hello Stefan (and everyone else!),
Thank you for your great comments! I think I have a 3c9xx card around
here somewhere, I will give that a shot when it reboots the next time
(just to see). It looks like for future systems I'll
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:14:26AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote..
On Mon, 2005-Jan-24 00:27:38 +0100, Stefan Eßer wrote:
The TX threshold messages issued by the dc driver appear more as an
indication that the PCI bus is under severe load, than as a hint that
the dc driver is causing the reboots,
Hello,
I regret that I have never posted to this list before, despite the fact I
have been using FreeBSD in one form or another for many years now (since
2.x era). I'm a bit cranky, so please do not take any of this wrong. I
have a system running FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (bites tongue).
In any
On Sun, 2005-Jan-23 05:57:53 -0800, Net Virtual Mailing Lists wrote:
It would be nice if somewhere there was
some statement of a fact that NIC is known to work well with
FreeBSD.
I recall seeing quite a few such statements about different cards over
the years. In general, such statements
Net Virtual Mailing Lists wrote:
[ ... ]
[ ... ] It would be nice if somewhere there was
some statement of a fact that NIC is known to work well with
FreeBSD. I'm aware of all of the FUD out there, about people beating
their chests saying how wonderful NIC-A is or NIC-B is, and I've tried
You know, I don't really care what NIC I use - I really don't. I'm not
so much interested in trying to figure out why this NIC is giving me
grief as much as I am in finding one that will work. I would just like
someone somewhere to tell me what is a stable NIC to use for FreeBSD,
As several
On 2005-01-23 05:57 -0800, Net Virtual Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My latest problem is with a:
dc0: ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xe608-
0xe60803ff irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0
dc0: Ethernet address: 00:0c:41:ed:ae:85
... after several hours of
Hello Stefan (and everyone else!),
Thank you for your great comments! I think I have a 3c9xx card around
here somewhere, I will give that a shot when it reboots the next time
(just to see). It looks like for future systems I'll standardize on the
Intel fxp-based cards, I really appreciate that
On Mon, 2005-Jan-24 00:27:38 +0100, Stefan Eßer wrote:
The TX threshold messages issued by the dc driver appear more as an
indication that the PCI bus is under severe load, than as a hint that
the dc driver is causing the reboots, IMHO.
Under Tru64, I've seen Tulip cards report backoff to 1024
The TX threshold messages issued by the dc driver appear more as an
indication that the PCI bus is under severe load, than as a hint that
the dc driver is causing the reboots, IMHO.
I've also seen them when the card is a CardBus card, which may
indicate some slightly pessimal performance
11 matches
Mail list logo
