freebsd-stable is not an advocacy list. This is very off-topic.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni
wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
>>
>> For the masses:
>>
>> - NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including
2009/6/22 Eric Furman
> BWAAAHAHAHAHAH, what a bunch of retards
> Please stop sending this crap to OBSD lists.
That is surely one of the most brilliant replies I've ever seen from an
advocacy@ address.
Yes, I am being sarcastic.
___
freebsd-stable@f
2009/6/22 Eric Furman :
> BWAAAHAHAHAHAH, what a bunch of retards
> Please stop sending this crap to OBSD lists.
>
Oh yeah, OpenBSD people also tend to be *very* direct with
conversations, demonstrated by Eric here.
Not entirely a criticism, it's just that you can expect the climate in
mailing l
BWAAAHAHAHAHAH, what a bunch of retards
Please stop sending this crap to OBSD lists.
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:55:14 +0200, "Holger Kipp"
said:
> Daniel Bolgheroni schrieb:
> > On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
> >>
> >> For
Daniel Bolgheroni schrieb:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
For the masses:
- NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters)
- OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible
- FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms
It's a mi
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Kester
Sent: 19 June 2009 20:24
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
On Fri 19 Jun 2009 at 11:23:26 PDT Michael R. Wayne wrote:
>
>OK, I&#
OBSD is the best choice of OS for people who like violent little fish
mascots.
And it has blue-boot-console-thingy (tm) . Ace.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send a
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
>
> For the masses:
>
> - NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters)
> - OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible
> - FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms
It's a mistake to make this associ
> I agree, this shouldn't necessarily be treated as flamebait or trolling.
>
> But shouldn't the question be redirected to the advocacy mailing
> list/team?
Yes. This list is for targeted technical questions. It isn't realistic
to expect a discussion of this nature to stay on-topic.
-Kip
On Fri 19 Jun 2009 at 11:23:26 PDT Michael R. Wayne wrote:
OK, I'm going to take a guess here that English may not be Michal's primary
language and re-ask his question:
Given the several versions of *BSD, I have been led to understand
that each excells in different ways. How do I select wh
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
> Individuals in each of the camps (Free, Open, Net) are frequently
> deeply invested in their platforms of choice to the point where they
> identify with them. In addition, many if not most of us are only
> familiar with one of them. Thus, it isn'
Individuals in each of the camps (Free, Open, Net) are frequently
deeply invested in their platforms of choice to the point where they
identify with them. In addition, many if not most of us are only
familiar with one of them. Thus, it isn't really fair to ask us to
compare the three. You will enjo
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:23:09AM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2009 04:47:35 Michal wrote:
> >
> > "Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
> > I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
> > prove this though."
>
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Giancarlo Razzolini
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 19 de junho de 2009 11:01
Para: Michal
Cc: m...@openbsd.org; dem...@thephinix.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Assunto: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
Michal escreveu:
> It wasn't an argument or a versus anyt
-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
dem...@thephinix.org
Sent: 19 June 2009 12:42
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; m...@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is muc
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Michal wrote:
> It wasn't an argument or a versus anything. It was just a question relating
> to what he had said and the truth in it and the two OS's being used for
> different reasons. That's all. No rage, no debate or looking for any winner!
To be fair,
On 19 Jun 2009, at 14:02, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa.
Above all, they contribute to the genetic diversity in the operating
system pool.
Which is a good thing.
- Ruben
___
freebsd-stabl
thus dem...@thephinix.org spake:
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa.
Exactly.
So why feeding this iss
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa. So why feeding this issue up since up to this very moment,
there is no w
[mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
dem...@thephinix.org
Sent: 19 June 2009 12:42
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; m...@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared
I agree. Thanks for reminding. I will not reply to this one anymore.
Regards,
Cem
dem...@thephinix.org, 06/19/09 14:41:
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each o
I have used NetBSD several years on mainly amd64 platform, and these are
+ properties.
- Xen support and boot NetBSD as dom0 and a Linux ie; Ubuntu as domU.
- Clean design of rc.d scripts. Also NetBSD does not automatically
populate rc.d scripts, user adds sample one (displayed after install
and the security is in netbsd:
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?security+8+NetBSD-5.0
http://www.netbsd.org/~elad/recent/recent06.pdf
On 6/19/09, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Kim Attree wrote:
>
>> NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I
>> don't
>> have any weird hard
On Friday 19 June 2009 04:47:35 Michal wrote:
> Someone once said this too me
>
> "Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
> I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
> prove this though."
>
> Every offence to the person which sai
Michal
Sent: 19 June 2009 10:48 AM
To: m...@openbsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Open Vs Free BSD
Someone once said this too me
"Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out t
Kim Attree wrote:
NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I don't
have any weird hardware, I've never had a use for NetBSD.
I don't use NetBSD either but some recent development that come from
that camp are very interesting:
* Journalling UFS ("smart" journalling
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
> Someone once said this too me
>
> "Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
> I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
> prove this though."
>
> Every offence to the perso
Someone once said this too me
"Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
prove this though."
Every offence to the person which said this, but they are not the best admin
ever, though
28 matches
Mail list logo
