On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'd recommend staying away from Realtek NICs. Pick up an Intel Pro/
1000
GT or PT. Realtek has a well-known history of issues.
Just wanted to tell you guys that so far a em(4) seems to have fixed
the problem.
--
Peter Ankerstål
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 22:58 +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:08:34 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend staying away from Realtek NICs. Pick up an Intel
Pro/1000 GT or PT. Realtek has a well-known history of issues.
I hear that story very
Hi,
Im using a built in re(4) card and it seems like its causes data-
corruption as soon as it gets some load (or after a few hours online)
The machine is running FreeBSD 7.0R:
FreeBSD ninja 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Apr 16 22:49:15
CEST 2008 [EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:18:10PM +0200, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
Im using a built in re(4) card and it seems like its causes data-corruption
as soon as it gets some load (or after a few hours online)
The machine is running FreeBSD 7.0R:
FreeBSD ninja 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Wed
On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
tcpdump reporting bad cksum can occur due to TX/RX checksum
offloading. Do you not see this message normally, but only when the
problem begins?
Have you tried turning off TX/RX offloading to see if the erroneous
behaviour goes away?
Have
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:30:27PM +0200, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
tcpdump reporting bad cksum can occur due to TX/RX checksum
offloading. Do you not see this message normally, but only when the
problem begins?
Have you tried turning off
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:18:10 +0200
Peter Ankerstål [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Im using a built in re(4) card and it seems like its causes data-
corruption as soon as it gets some load (or after a few hours online)
IIRC, this is a known issue with if_re and 7.0-R. It is fixed in
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:08:34 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend staying away from Realtek NICs. Pick up an Intel
Pro/1000 GT or PT. Realtek has a well-known history of issues.
I hear that story very often, so often that I almost think it's a fairy
tale. :-)
Most of
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:58:55PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:08:34 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend staying away from Realtek NICs. Pick up an Intel
Pro/1000 GT or PT. Realtek has a well-known history of issues.
I hear that
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'd recommend staying away from Realtek NICs. Pick up an Intel
Pro/1000 GT or PT. Realtek has a well-known history of issues.
Just a note about the Intel Pro/1000 GT: it is on-sale[1] at NewEgg
with free shipping. I just bought my third one to
10 matches
Mail list logo
