Albert Chin wrote:
The arrays are configured with write-thru write policy, adaptive
read policy, and cachedio cache policy.
cachedio will slow you down on the old LSI cards. Only enable it on the
PCI-X and above adapters.
/Martin
___
Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some
bonnie++ tests on a RAID 1 array between two U320 drives for the
On 9/29/06, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are very speedy cards once you put them into their intended
configuration. With some decent SCSI disks and a PCI-X bus, it
performs quite well. However, I'm actually kinda surprised that the
card works at all in your 5V slot.
I have a
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:33:14AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:15:05PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some
bonnie++ tests on a
In the last episode (Sep 29), Albert Chin said:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:15:05PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some
bonnie++ tests on a RAID 1 array between two U320 drives for the first
channel and on a
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:15:05PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
I don't understand how #1 gives 16MB/s (RAID 1) while #3 gives only
17MB/s. I'd expect #3 to be about x2 the performance of #1.
The arrays are configured with write-thru write policy, adaptive
read policy, and cachedio cache
