Re: Re: Re: Re: freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and silly rename

2010-06-13 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: My note was not an objection, only a note. Also, when committing, please add a comment explaining what is going on. Righto, and my response was just my opinion. I'm assuming Mikolaj is looking at committing this? rick

Re: Re: freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and silly rename

2010-06-12 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Me??ner wrote: LM Hi, LM I hope this is not the wrong list to ask. Didn't get any answers on LM -questions. LM When you try to do the

Re: Re: freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and silly rename

2010-06-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:15:49AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Me??ner wrote: LM Hi, LM I hope this is not the wrong list to ask. Didn't

Re: Re: Re: freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and silly rename

2010-06-12 Thread Rick Macklem
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: Yes, I hoped that Mikolaj ends up with something similar :). Please note that this is racy, since we cannot know why usecount is greater then 1. This might cause the silly rename to kick in some time where it should not, but the race is rare. I'd

Re: Re: Re: freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and silly rename

2010-06-12 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:06:11PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: Yes, I hoped that Mikolaj ends up with something similar :). Please note that this is racy, since we cannot know why usecount is greater then 1. This might cause the silly rename