Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD

2005-11-27 Thread Kim Culhan
Running -Stable make world with recent Intel and AMD hardware
yielded some interesting results.

One machine:

CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (2010.31-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x20ff0  Stepping = 0

Other machine:

CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.60GHz (3600.12-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0xf34  Stepping = 4

The Intel machine had hyperthreading disabled in the bios.

kernel config for both machines was GENERIC

Running 'make world' several times on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE from
11-26-05 a couple of representative timings were:

AMD Athlon 64

45:42

45:19


Intel P4

55:22

54:57


Are there any optimizations for the P4 which might be added to the GENERIC
kernel config to improve the performance ?

-kim

--
w8hdkim err gmail.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD

2005-11-27 Thread Subhro

Kim Culhan sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/28/2005 1:05:

Running -Stable make world with recent Intel and AMD hardware
yielded some interesting results.

One machine:

CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (2010.31-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD  Id = 0x20ff0  Stepping = 0

Other machine:

CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.60GHz (3600.12-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0xf34  Stepping = 4

The Intel machine had hyperthreading disabled in the bios.

kernel config for both machines was GENERIC

Running 'make world' several times on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE from
11-26-05 a couple of representative timings were:

AMD Athlon 64

45:42

45:19


Intel P4

55:22

54:57


Are there any optimizations for the P4 which might be added to the GENERIC
kernel config to improve the performance ?

-kim

--
w8hdkim err gmail.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
Let us have a look at /etc/make.conf. BTW, my *personal* opinion is AMD 
implements much better pipelining and concurrent processing compared to 
the Intel platform. So what you see is not something entirely unexpected.


Thanks
S.

--
---
\   / | Subhro Sankha Kar 
 \./  |   GSM: +919831010002  --  Fax: +919831832913  
(0Y0) |MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  Yahoo!: subhro82
-ooO--(_)--Ooo-


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD

2005-11-27 Thread Kim Culhan
On 11/27/05, Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Kim Culhan sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/28/2005 1:05:

  Running -Stable make world with recent Intel and AMD hardware
  yielded some interesting results.

 Let us have a look at /etc/make.conf. BTW, my *personal* opinion is AMD
 implements much better pipelining and concurrent processing compared to
 the Intel platform. So what you see is not something entirely unexpected.

No /etc/make.conf in either case

-kim

--
w8hdkim err gmail.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD

2005-11-27 Thread pete wright
On 11/27/05, Kim Culhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 11/27/05, Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Kim Culhan sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/28/2005 1:05:

   Running -Stable make world with recent Intel and AMD hardware
   yielded some interesting results.

  Let us have a look at /etc/make.conf. BTW, my *personal* opinion is AMD
  implements much better pipelining and concurrent processing compared to
  the Intel platform. So what you see is not something entirely unexpected.

 No /etc/make.conf in either case

 -kim

Are you using the same disks, and disk controllers on each machine?   
building work+kernel does a fair amount of disk I/O, so that would be
one thing to investigate.
-p

--
~~o0OO0o~~
Pete Wright
www.nycbug.org
NYC's *BSD User Group
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD

2005-11-27 Thread Subhro

Kim Culhan sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/28/2005 1:40:

On 11/27/05, Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Kim Culhan sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/28/2005 1:05:



  

Running -Stable make world with recent Intel and AMD hardware
yielded some interesting results.
  


  

Let us have a look at /etc/make.conf. BTW, my *personal* opinion is AMD
implements much better pipelining and concurrent processing compared to
the Intel platform. So what you see is not something entirely unexpected.



No /etc/make.conf in either case

-kim

--
w8hdkim err gmail.com

  
Have a look at man 'make.conf' without the 's. Specially look closely at 
the CFLAGS, COPTFLAGS and CPUTYPE variables. Also please be kind enough 
not to send in HTML mails in this list. It's really irritating to 
decipher mail content from within HTML tags for unlucky souls like me 
who use a text based mail client to read mails.


Thanks
S.

--
---
\   / | Subhro Sankha Kar 
 \./  |   GSM: +919831010002  --  Fax: +919831832913  
(0Y0) |MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  Yahoo!: subhro82
-ooO--(_)--Ooo-


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]