Hello!
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 mtx_owned(Giant)),
(nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsafenet=1 Giant));
from nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c, line 570.
As I understand the problem, kern/vfs_lookup.c:lookup() could
aquire
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:06:44AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 mtx_owned(Giant)),
(nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsafenet=1 Giant));
from nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c, line 570.
Hi!
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Please, users who reported the problem and willing to help,
try the patch (generated against STABLE) and give the feedback.
I test it with RELENG_6 from 25 May 2006. It's work fine. Thank you.
WBR
--
Dmitriy Kirhlarov
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:19:26AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is:
Edit src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c
Add delta 1.80.2.6 2006.03.31.07.39.24 kris
On 5/25/06, Konstantin Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:19:26AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is:
Edit
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
+options QUOTA
options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists
options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories
options MD_ROOT # MD
Rong-en Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
[...]
Use tcpdump and related tools to find out what traffic is being sent.
Also verify that you did not change your system configuration
23, 2006 3:09 PM
To: Howard Leadmon
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Rong-en,
Thanks for the info on getting the debugger configured,
and on the serial
console
Another data point:
One of our NFS servers is an amd64 based system serving a cluster of web and
email servers. Under 6.1-RCx it gave us the same (or better) performance than
the server it replaced (which was 4.11). The server load hovered between 0.x
and 1.x
But after upping it to 6.1-STABLE
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Leadmon
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:23 PM
To: 'Rong-en Fan'
Cc: 'Konstantin Belousov'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
Hello Rong-en,
As an update, I did the below, and I still had the issue
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is:
Edit src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c
Add delta 1.80.2.6 2006.03.31.07.39.24 kris
Under the one that fails the vfs_lookup.c is:
Edit
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the
5.x
releases on the
If there are any thing I can provide to help tracking this down.
Please let me know. By the way, I tried with truss/kdump
to see what
happens when nfsd eats lot of CPUs, but in vain. They do
not return anything.
I tried your recipe on 7-CURRENT with locally exported fs,
On 5/23/06, Konstantin Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while,
On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are any thing I can provide to help tracking this down.
Please let me know. By the way, I tried with truss/kdump
to see what
happens when nfsd eats lot of CPUs, but in vain. They do
not return anything.
I tried your
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:19 AM
To: Howard Leadmon
Cc: Konstantin Belousov; Kris Kennaway; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are any thing I can provide
On 5/23/06, Howard Leadmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Rong-en,
Thanks for the info on getting the debugger configured, and on the serial
console. I will have to try and play with the serial console thing more, I
just tried putting in the flags and the damn thing hung, I had to boot
On 5/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
As I posted few days ago, I have similar problems like Howard's
(some details in the thread 6.1-RELEASE, em0 high interrupt rate
and nfsd eats lots of cpu on stable@). After binary searching
the source tree, I found that
with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually
running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I
basically have a small
network
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines
together.
This has all been running fine up till a
Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines
together.
This has all been
Are you running rpc.lockd? I've had very bad luck with it since
sometime in the 5.x series... especially with it interoperating with
Solaris. I submitted a PR on it, but it's apparently broken in about X
ways. If possible, I would suggest living without rpc.lockd for now (if
you're
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and
, May 14, 2006 5:54 PM
To: Howard Leadmon
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually
running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having
Howard Leadmon wrote:
Would this just be lockd, or should I disable both lockd and statd? I notice
in the rc.conf it claims they are both supposed to be enabled, so not sure
what issues I run into if I disable them, if any.
No need to disable rpc.statd though I don't know if any other
26 matches
Mail list logo
