on 07/09/2010 08:54 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
Can someone explain exactly what this sysctl does? The description is
only useful if you have familiarity with the scheduler internals:
$ sysctl -d kern.sched.preempt_thresh
kern.sched.preempt_thresh: Min priority for preemption, lower
on 06/09/2010 22:05 jhell said the following:
On 09/03/2010 20:14, David Xu wrote:
I think sysctl kern.sched.preempt_thresh is too low, default is only
64. I always tune it up to 200 on my desktop machine which is
running gnome and other GUI applications, for a heavy GUI deskkop, I
would
On 09/03/2010 20:14, David Xu wrote:
jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE
on 04/09/2010 03:14 David Xu said the following:
I think sysctl kern.sched.preempt_thresh is too low, default is only 64. I
always tune
it up to 200 on my desktop machine which is running gnome and other GUI
applications,
for a heavy GUI deskkop, I would tune it up to 224 to get better
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:05:53PM -0400, jhell wrote:
On 09/03/2010 20:14, David Xu wrote:
jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On
i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then
started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to
get the make clean to finish. it was taking forever to even paint the
xterm in the make clean window.
-stable built as of last week, amd64 kernel,
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:03 -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then
started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to
get the make clean to finish. it was taking forever to even paint the
xterm in the make clean
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Michal Varga wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:03 -0500, Jim Bryant wrote:
i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then
started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to
get the make clean to finish.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:50:10 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
Just be aware of this problem[1] when using it. (I've been working
on a proper fix -- not a hack -- for the problem for about a week now.
Stress level is very high given the ambiguous nature of many aspects
of
jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived desktop. This setup (which is
pretty standard) is providing abysmal interactive performance on an
eight-core machine whenever I try to do anything CPU-intensive
on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived desktop. This setup (which is
pretty standard) is providing abysmal interactive performance on an
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following:
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived desktop. This setup (which is
pretty standard) is
Hello,
My machine has a similar behavior. For instance, during intensive
workload (portupgrade), everything is quite not-responsive.
I made an alias of portupgrade, nice -n 5 portupgrade, that solves the
problem just in that particular case.
My system is AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived desktop. This setup (which is
pretty standard) is providing abysmal interactive performance on an
eight-core machine whenever I try to do anything CPU-intensive (such as
building a port).
Basically, trying to build anything from ports rapidly renders
On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived desktop. This setup (which is
pretty standard) is providing abysmal interactive performance on an
eight-core machine whenever I try to do anything CPU-intensive (such as
building a port).
Basically, trying
16 matches
Mail list logo
