Am 09.11.2019 um 18:24 schrieb Kyle Evans:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 10:42 AM Chris Ross wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:53:25PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
You could try some bisection back along the 12 branch..
Yeah. I was hoping for an
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 16:07, Toomas Soome wrote:
>> On 9. Nov 2019, at 22:42, Chris Ross wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:24:49AM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> That helps- thanks! I'm CC'ing tsoome@, as this is basically just
>>> r353501 in that range. Can you give the
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:24:49AM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That helps- thanks! I'm CC'ing tsoome@, as this is basically just
> r353501 in that range. Can you give the latest -CURRENT snapshot boot
> as another data point?
Thanks. And yeah, happily, I was already in the process of
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 10:42 AM Chris Ross wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:53:25PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> You could try some bisection back along the 12 branch..
> >
> > Yeah. I was hoping for an easier
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:53:25PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
> > >> You could try some bisection back along the 12 branch..
>
> Yeah. I was hoping for an easier path, but. I can try slogging back
> through stable-12 a month or two at
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Kyle Evans wrote:
The lua replacement is almost certainly not related to the problem at
hand, and I suspect it is not related to your problem either (unless
your problem is simply that you hate lua). Do you have a PR open for
any real problem?
The problem appeared with
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:56:00AM +1000, George Michaelson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:21 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > I suspect a separate bug because the OP specified that it worked in
> > 12.0 where those bugs go back to 9.x
>
> Oh, I didn't realize I updated a PXE boot PR. I
[Resend, because I was apparently not subscribed to this list;
apologies for the duplicates]
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:00 AM Roderick wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, George Michaelson wrote:
>
> > And, this state has existed for some time.
>
> Someone spoiled the loader putting lua there
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, George Michaelson wrote:
And, this state has existed for some time.
Someone spoiled the loader putting lua there without necessity
and is careless for the consequences.
We have forth there and that is more than enough. Of course, you
can put also python tbere, because
Oh, I didn't realize I updated a PXE boot PR. I am not PXE: I tested
with real media in a Dell, and with Dell iDRAC virtualized media, and
with USB.
I absolutely represent a user who has h/w which I can reproducably
show cannot load UEFI from true and virtualized local media, not PXE.
And, this
On 11/6/19 4:04 PM, George Michaelson wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239876 is relevant maybe?
I suspect a separate bug because the OP specified that it worked in
12.0 where those bugs go back to 9.x
Julian.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
No. That's netboot which is a different path in the loader.
Warner
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019, 5:04 PM George Michaelson wrote:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239876 is relevant
> maybe?
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > On 11/6/19 2:53 PM, Warner
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239876 is relevant maybe?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On 11/6/19 2:53 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:03 PM Chris Ross wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
On 11/6/19 2:53 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:03 PM Chris Ross wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a
[...]
I need to do? How has 12.1 changed w.r.t. 12.0 for UEFI?
More
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:03 PM Chris Ross wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
> >
> > Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a
> system
> > here, which didn't work, and I found that
> FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
> > did work
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
>
> Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a system
> here, which didn't work, and I found that FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
> did work on that same system. [Systems were configured to boot in UEFI
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:17:11 -0500 Chris Ross cross+free...@distal.com said
Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a system
here, which didn't work, and I found that
FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
did work on that same system. Another [older] system I had was
Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a system
here, which didn't work, and I found that FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
did work on that same system. Another [older] system I had was working with
FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso, but after I had reason to
18 matches
Mail list logo
