Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-17 Thread Shiv. Nath
On 16/06/2012 21:03, Shiv. Nath wrote: Dear Matthew, Matthew, one a, one e. first thanks for assisting to secure 22/25 ports from brute force attack. i wish to consult if the following white list looks fine to exclude trusted networks (own network) int0=em0 secured_attack_ports={21,22,25}

Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-16 Thread Shiv. Nath
Ooops. Yes, -t bruteforce is correct. expire 604800 means delete entries after they've been in the table for that number of seconds (ie after one week) Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard

Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/06/2012 21:03, Shiv. Nath wrote: Dear Metthew, Matthew, one a, one e. first thanks for assisting to secure 22/25 ports from brute force attack. i wish to consult if the following white list looks fine to exclude trusted networks (own network) int0=em0