On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:48:43 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> No error message but a reboot...
>
> I add:
>
> loop main.6 # If not last, read another
>
> mov $msg_debug,%si
> call putstr
>
> mov $MEM_BTX,
On 06/22/2011 17:58, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223365)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
*/
/* Memory Locations */
- .set MEM_REL,0x700 # Relocat
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:23:22 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> > This time:
> >
> > LBA: 3c802308
> > Read error: 04
> >
> > This morning I was reading the code (I'm in Belgium) and find that the
> > previous LBA output was DAP+4 and so was the addr o
On 06/22/2011 16:23, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also,
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we
should leave the EDD packet on the stack so it doesn't get trashed by
calling hex8,
On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we
should leave the EDD packet on the stack
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> I get
>
> LBA: 8200
> Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we
should leave the EDD packet on the stack so it doesn't get trashed by
calling hex8, etc. Please try this:
Index: zfsldr
On 06/21/2011 23:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:13:20 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
and I get:
Read error: 04
Hmm, that is the error for an invalid sector. Try this patch. It reshuffles
a few more things and adds code to dump the low
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:13:20 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
> and I get:
>
> Read error: 04
Hmm, that is the error for an invalid sector. Try this patch. It reshuffles
a few more things and adds code to dump the low 32-bits of the LBA on an
error:
Ind
On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:02:28 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Henne
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:02:28 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> >> On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/21/20
On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> >> On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> Index: zfsldr.S
> >>>
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223339)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
@@
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Index: zfsldr.S
> > ===
> > --- zfsldr.S(revision 223339)
> > +++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
> > @@ -234,9 +234,12
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223339)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
@@ -234,9 +234,12 @@ nread.1: xor %ecx,%ecx # Get
callw read
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 5:51:22 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 15:51, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:04:07 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> >> On 06/17/2011 19:37, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/16/2011
On 06/20/2011 15:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:04:07 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/17/2011 19:37, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan
I finally redo everything with GPT-based solution. At the same time, I
found a problem with zpool.cache and I fixed with:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=4185
zpool.cache will be changed after you exported the zpool... Anyway,
now I'm OK with my freebsd-only box, again.
On Fri, Jun 17,
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:04:07 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 19:37, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> >> On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Exactly. The MFC
If this problem can not be solved, I probably have to redo everything
to use GPT-based solution and lose my Windows.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
>> On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On T
On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> >> Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
> >> mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
> >
> > Can yo
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
>> mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
>
> Can you try reverting this change:
>
> Author: jhb
> Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
Can you try reverting this change:
Author: jhb
Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:24 2011
New Re
I wish I can get a binary version... Because I have no working FreeBSD
box now
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:35 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
>> mm@. Maybe some untested ch
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
> mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
Can you try reverting this change:
Author: jhb
Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:24 2011
New Revision: 221177
URL: http://svn.freebsd.or
Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 07:32, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>>
>> I just redo everything, and changed the order of freebsd-zfs and
>> freebsd-swap.
On 06/16/2011 07:32, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
I just redo everything, and changed the order of freebsd-zfs and
freebsd-swap. The "Read error" still happens!
Just a me too.
Everything was working great with zfsboot from 8.2-RELEASE + a patch
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/153552).
I just redo everything, and changed the order of freebsd-zfs and
freebsd-swap. The "Read error" still happens!
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 06/15/11 17:42, Zhiha
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/15/11 17:42, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I configured my disk layout according to
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition
>>
>> But I swapped the order of the freebsd-zfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/15/11 17:42, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I configured my disk layout according to
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition
>
> But I swapped the order of the freebsd-zfs and freebsd-swap. The 4.0G
> freebsd-swap partition appears
Hi,
I configured my disk layout according to
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition
But I swapped the order of the freebsd-zfs and freebsd-swap. The 4.0G
freebsd-swap partition appears first inside the slice.
After that, I write zfsboot on both ada0s2 and ada0s2b, but the boot0
gives
32 matches
Mail list logo
