Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-13 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:48:36 +0200, Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The machine is a Compaq Armada m700, kernel is GENERIC from fresh installation; dmesg output is attached. Yes, I have apm build into the kernel. Does your

apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
Hi, is apm not available in 5.4? I've loaded the apm module in loader.conf, and kldstat shows it loaded but /dev/apm* isn't created and there are no messages in dmesg either. How do I enable this? mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:07:29 +0200, Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, is apm not available in 5.4? I've loaded the apm module in loader.conf, and kldstat shows it loaded but /dev/apm* isn't created and there are no messages in dmesg either. How do I enable this? It is available. I'm

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: Hi, is apm not available in 5.4? I've loaded the apm module in loader.conf, and kldstat shows it loaded but /dev/apm* isn't created and there are no messages in dmesg either. How do I enable this? Please, use acpi instead

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
Ronald Klop wrote: It is available. I'm running it on my laptop now. I've these in my config. grep apm /etc/rc.conf apm_enable=YES apmd_enable=YES Do you have apm(4) compiled into the kernel? I've loaded the module in loader.conf and during boot aswell when I try to use apm(8), I get:

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:48:36 +0200, Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ronald Klop wrote: It is available. I'm running it on my laptop now. I've these in my config. grep apm /etc/rc.conf apm_enable=YES apmd_enable=YES Do you have apm(4) compiled into the kernel? I've loaded the module in

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 12 May 2005 17:23:52 +0200, Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ronald Klop wrote: Yes, I have apm build into the kernel. Does your machine have apm? As somebody else mentioned first try if you have ACPI support on your machine. It is a modern, more advanced version of apm. If ACPI

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
Ronald Klop wrote: Report your panic on the mailinglist or using send-pr. I can't help you with it, but there are people who can. Try to compile a kernel with apm in and acpi not in and I think I have also something like pmtimer which is used by apm. And make sure acpi isn't loaded as a

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
I wrote: I'll now try and build a kernel with apm built in, as apparently the .ko doesn't do anything. Maybe this will work. Doesn't work either.. same thing as with apm.ko loaded. No errors, no device node. mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:40:20 +0200, Matthias Buelow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wrote: I'll now try and build a kernel with apm built in, as apparently the .ko doesn't do anything. Maybe this will work. Doesn't work either.. same thing as with apm.ko loaded. No errors, no device node. I found

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
I wrote: Doesn't work either.. same thing as with apm.ko loaded. No errors, no device node. The cause was that I didn't change in /boot/devices.hint the line: hint.apm.0.disabled=0 to 1... Thanks to Ronald Klop for the hint. I didn't know it was explicitly disabled by default, maybe I should

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-12 Thread Matthias Buelow
The cause was that I didn't change in /boot/devices.hint the line: hint.apm.0.disabled=0 to 1... Thanks to Ronald Klop for the hint. Or rather, the other way round, of course. mkb. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list