Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
all devices, but only last 95 devices?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/# mdconfig -l
md545 md546 md547 md548 md549 md550 md551 md552 md553 md554 md555 md556
md557 md558 md559 md560 md561 md562 md563 md564 md565 md566 md567 md568
md569
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
all devices, but only last 95 devices?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/# mdconfig -l
md545 md546 md547 md548 md549 md550 md551 md552 md553 md554 md555 md556
md557 md558 md559 md560
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi, on CURRENT it work's good.
Here is one PR related to this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/92062
Unfortunately without any response for more than half year. :(
Thanks for your reply.
Miroslav Lachman
Hi, on CURRENT it work's good.
Here is one PR related to this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/92062
Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
all devices, but only last 95 devices?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/# mdconfig -l
md545 md546 md547 md548
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
all devices, but only last 95 devices?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/# mdconfig -l
md545 md546 md547 md548
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 03:41:03PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
all devices, but only last 95 devices?
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Saturday 28 April 2007, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Is it a bug or is it a desired feature, that mdconfig -l doesn't list
all devices, but only last 95 devices?
[..]
Can somebody test it on STABLE / CURRENT?
It works
