Re: fsck vs zvol
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 22:21, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > 12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..) > > You should correct this page and change the line for /etc/fstab > and use non-zero value for fsck pass number. Good idea, done. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck vs zvol
12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >>> The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..) You should correct this page and change the line for /etc/fstab and use non-zero value for fsck pass number. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck vs zvol
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 15:47, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: >> Am 12.06.2019 um 03:04 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel : >> I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it >> doesn't work due to ACL issues). > > AFAIK this was fixed by iX Systems for Samba 4.9: > > https://jira.ixsystems.com/browse/NAS-100698 > > You might want to check if they upstreamed it or if the patch can be > incorporated in the FreeBSD port if not. Thanks, I see the samba48 port has a ZFS provisioning patch so I guess it's not necessary anymore. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net/samba48/files/0001-Zfs-provision-1.patch?revision=475995=markup I'll find out when I get around to setting up another Samba 4 on ZFS but not sure how long that will be :( -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck vs zvol
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 15:51, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> >> Oh I see for the passno field.. It must be non-zero it fsck won't check it >> at all! > > And you don't need to change /etc/rc.d/fsck script at all. Yeah I reverted that change now. Thanks again :) -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck vs zvol
12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >> Please show your /etc/fstab line for this UFS-inside-ZVOL and your changes >> to rc.d/fsck. >> Your logs do not show that fsck is started so I presume some mistake in the >> /etc/fstab. >> Maybe you forgot that it needs non-zero sixth field. > > The fsck line is.. > /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol /var/db/samba4/sysvol ufs rw,acls 0 0 > > The diff is just.. > --- fsck.orig 2019-06-12 14:43:03.279407000 +0930 > +++ fsck 2019-06-12 14:42:51.094142000 +0930 > @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ > # During fsck ignore SIGQUIT > trap : 3 > > + echo "Samba FS hack" > + fsck -y /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol > + err=$? > + > check_startmsgs && echo "Starting file system checks:" > if checkyesno background_fsck; then > fsck -F -p > > Oh I see for the passno field.. It must be non-zero it fsck won't check it at > all! And you don't need to change /etc/rc.d/fsck script at all. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck vs zvol
Hi all, > Am 12.06.2019 um 03:04 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel : > I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it > doesn't work due to ACL issues). AFAIK this was fixed by iX Systems for Samba 4.9: https://jira.ixsystems.com/browse/NAS-100698 You might want to check if they upstreamed it or if the patch can be incorporated in the FreeBSD port if not. Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe i...@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck vs zvol
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 14:40, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > 12.06.2019 8:04, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > >> Hi, >> I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it >> doesn't work due to ACL issues). >> >> I found that I usually have to manually fsck it on a bad reboot, even if I >> have fsck_y_enable so I added a hack to /etc/rc.d/fsck to fsck -y that FS >> before the normal fsck runs. >> >> Logging looks like.. >> >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Setting hostuuid: >> ----ac1f6b01103a. >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Setting hostid: 0x6cbfec5d. >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Starting file system checks: >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting local filesystems:mount: >> /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol: R/W mount of /var/db/samba4/sysvol denied. >> Filesystem is not clean - run fsck.: Operation not permitted >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, will >> retry after root mount hold release >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: mount: /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol: R/W mount >> of /var/db/samba4/sysvol denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck.: >> Operation not permitted >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: . >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup >> aborted >> Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)! >> >> I'm not sure if marking this FS as 'late' would help (and/or break something >> else..) >> >> Has anyone else tried something like this? >> >> The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..) > > Please show your /etc/fstab line for this UFS-inside-ZVOL and your changes to > rc.d/fsck. > Your logs do not show that fsck is started so I presume some mistake in the > /etc/fstab. > Maybe you forgot that it needs non-zero sixth field. The fsck line is.. /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol /var/db/samba4/sysvol ufs rw,acls 0 0 The diff is just.. --- fsck.orig 2019-06-12 14:43:03.279407000 +0930 +++ fsck2019-06-12 14:42:51.094142000 +0930 @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ # During fsck ignore SIGQUIT trap : 3 + echo "Samba FS hack" + fsck -y /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol + err=$? + check_startmsgs && echo "Starting file system checks:" if checkyesno background_fsck; then fsck -F -p Oh I see for the passno field.. It must be non-zero it fsck won't check it at all! Today I Learnt... :) Thanks Eugene! -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: fsck vs zvol
12.06.2019 8:04, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > Hi, > I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it > doesn't work due to ACL issues). > > I found that I usually have to manually fsck it on a bad reboot, even if I > have fsck_y_enable so I added a hack to /etc/rc.d/fsck to fsck -y that FS > before the normal fsck runs. > > Logging looks like.. > > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Setting hostuuid: > ----ac1f6b01103a. > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Setting hostid: 0x6cbfec5d. > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Starting file system checks: > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting local filesystems:mount: > /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol: R/W mount of /var/db/samba4/sysvol denied. > Filesystem is not clean - run fsck.: Operation not permitted > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, will > retry after root mount hold release > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: mount: /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol: R/W mount of > /var/db/samba4/sysvol denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck.: Operation > not permitted > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: . > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup > aborted > Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)! > > I'm not sure if marking this FS as 'late' would help (and/or break something > else..) > > Has anyone else tried something like this? > > The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..) Please show your /etc/fstab line for this UFS-inside-ZVOL and your changes to rc.d/fsck. Your logs do not show that fsck is started so I presume some mistake in the /etc/fstab. Maybe you forgot that it needs non-zero sixth field. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
fsck vs zvol
Hi, I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it doesn't work due to ACL issues). I found that I usually have to manually fsck it on a bad reboot, even if I have fsck_y_enable so I added a hack to /etc/rc.d/fsck to fsck -y that FS before the normal fsck runs. Logging looks like.. Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Setting hostuuid: ----ac1f6b01103a. Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Setting hostid: 0x6cbfec5d. Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Starting file system checks: Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting local filesystems:mount: /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol: R/W mount of /var/db/samba4/sysvol denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck.: Operation not permitted Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, will retry after root mount hold release Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: mount: /dev/zvol/zroot/samba4sysvol: R/W mount of /var/db/samba4/sysvol denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck.: Operation not permitted Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: . Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted Jun 12 09:45:41 moo kernel: ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)! I'm not sure if marking this FS as 'late' would help (and/or break something else..) Has anyone else tried something like this? The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..) Thanks. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
