I would say in this case you're *not* giving the entire disk to the
pool, you're giving ZFS a geom that's one sector smaller than the disk.
ZFS never sees or can touch the glabel metadata.
Is ZFS happy if the size of it's disc changes underneath it ? I have
expanded a zpool a couple of
Not to derail this discussion, but can anyone explain if the actual
glabel metadata is protected in any way? If I use glabel to label a
disk and then create a pool using /dev/label/disklabel, won't ZFS
eventually overwrite the glabel metadata in the last sector since the
disk in it's entirety
Dan Naumov wrote:
If I use glabel to label a
disk and then create a pool using /dev/label/disklabel, won't ZFS
eventually overwrite the glabel metadata in the last sector since the
disk in it's entirety is given to the pool?
I would say in this case you're *not* giving the entire disk to the
