On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:15:59PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Hi,
I've recently migrated my workstation from i386 to amd64
(finally, because I neeed to go beyond 4 GB RAM). The
transition went smoothly so far, except for one thing:
I need to use several old i386 binaries, which all work
31.05.2012 16:58, Konstantin Belousov writes:
But actually I shouldn't have to use LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH.
I mean, it's ldconfig's job to configure the directories for
locating the libraries.
What is wrong here?
The library search order is LD_{32}_LIBRARY_PATH, then DT_RPATH from
the binary,
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
The library search order is LD_{32}_LIBRARY_PATH, then DT_RPATH from
the binary, then hints, then /lib:/usr/lib. So if rpath of the binary
contains /usr/local/lib, you get /usr/local/lib before hints.
Rtld uses only the search path from the hints file. When a
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
31.05.2012 16:58, Konstantin Belousov writes:
The library search order is LD_{32}_LIBRARY_PATH, then DT_RPATH from
the binary, then hints, then /lib:/usr/lib. So if rpath of the binary
contains /usr/local/lib, you get /usr/local/lib before hints.
Rtld uses
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:28:42PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
31.05.2012 16:58, Konstantin Belousov writes:
But actually I shouldn't have to use LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH.
I mean, it's ldconfig's job to configure the directories for
locating the libraries.
What is wrong here?
The
31.05.2012 18:22, Oliver Fromme пишет:
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
31.05.2012 16:58, Konstantin Belousov writes:
The library search order is LD_{32}_LIBRARY_PATH, then DT_RPATH from
the binary, then hints, then /lib:/usr/lib. So if rpath of the binary
contains /usr/local/lib, you get
Hi,
I've recently migrated my workstation from i386 to amd64
(finally, because I neeed to go beyond 4 GB RAM). The
transition went smoothly so far, except for one thing:
I need to use several old i386 binaries, which all work
well except for one: olvwm.
$ uname -rsm
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE-20120528
