On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:34:41 +0200,
Milan Obuch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Funny observation: r is on LEFT keyboard side, l is on RIGHT keyboard
side. I for one have problem at times precisely for this reason, but I know
this is an important step and one need to act with great care.
I
Eugene Kazarinov wrote:
[...]
# 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC).
# 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt).
# 6. `mergemaster -p'
# 7. `make installworld'
[...]
Pls tell me what for I need 5 step?
Ask Bjørn Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We got 4 new SuperMicro boxes[1] with Xeon 3320 processors. They'll
be used as firewalls / very basic routers (our network on one side,
the world via a /29 on the other side). We currently use Soekris and
PC Engine boxes for this (with
On 2008-Aug-08 14:36:42 +0200, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, in amd64 mode there are twice as many CPU
registers available, enabling better optimizations for
the C compiler. Furthermore those registers are twice
as long, which means that 64bit quantities can be handled
with
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:58:06AM -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
We got 4 new SuperMicro boxes[1] with Xeon 3320 processors. They'll be
used as firewalls / very basic routers (our network on one side, the
world via a /29 on the other side). We currently use Soekris and PC
Engine boxes
On Thursday 07 August 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:58:06AM -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
[ snip ]
But be aware that there still are some applications (ports) which don't
behave correctly on amd64. So my recommendation is to build a test
box that mimics your
Hello everybody.
(sorry for my english)
# For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a
# delta of a few days):
#
# 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source
tree).
# 2. `make buildworld'
# 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE'
On Aug 7, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Milan Obuch wrote:
5) Get familiar with mergemaster, specifically the side-by-side
interactive diff feature. It looks scary the first time around,
but once you learn that r applies the stuff you see on the right,
and l applies the stuff you see on the left, you
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:52:30AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Vivek Khera, and lo! it spake thus:
The amd64 memory architecture is NUMA -- that is, depending on how
your RAM is layed out, some of it is faster to access for each
processor. Accessing RAM local to the other processor(s) is
Björn König wrote:
You might want to have a look at my private benchmarks too:
http://www.alpha-tierchen.de/dateien/etc/benchmark.html
Hmmm... your benchmarks show the same effect as I have on 5.4.
But I'm impressed by the RELENG_6 results. I think I'm going to
upgrade my system instantly.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:57:06PM +0200, Martin wrote:
Hi,
I've tried two benchmarks to check the speed of my
system on two FreeBSD architectures i386 and amd64.
My results for amd64 (haven't tried i386):
Hardware:
Athlon64 3400+ (2.4 GHz, 400 MHz FSB)
MSI Neo FSR (MSI-6702)
2x512 MB
Martin wrote:
But I'm impressed by the RELENG_6 results. I think I'm going to
upgrade my system instantly.
Yes, the results are slightly better, even the support of amd64 appears
to be much better, but I would be careful; it's easy to overrate
benchmark results. There is a lot that you can
On Jul 26, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Martin wrote:
Please notice the memory speed penalties while the
system is running on amd64 kernel. I would like to
know what causes this kind of low performance when
memory is being accessed.
The amd64 memory architecture is NUMA -- that is, depending on how
On Jul 27, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Vivek Khera wrote:
The amd64 memory architecture is NUMA -- that is, depending on how
your RAM is layed out, some of it is faster to access for each
processor. Accessing RAM local to the other processor(s) is slower.
There are many subtle issues relating to
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:57:06PM +0200, Martin wrote:
Hi,
I've tried two benchmarks to check the speed of my
system on two FreeBSD architectures i386 and amd64.
I've never seen anyone posting this kind of benchmark,
so here is what I found out:
here the results of nbench:
Hi,
I've tried two benchmarks to check the speed of my
system on two FreeBSD architectures i386 and amd64.
I've never seen anyone posting this kind of benchmark,
so here is what I found out:
here the results of nbench:
http://phpfi.com/71540
here is what openssl speed gives me:
You might want to have a look at my private benchmarks too:
http://www.alpha-tierchen.de/dateien/etc/benchmark.html
Björn
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
17 matches
Mail list logo
