On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
If you have a back to back connection to another NIC on Port 0, no
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems
with
82576 down in my group here. The way link works I can be about 99.9% sure
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Mars G Miro s...@anarchy.in.the.ph wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
If you have a back to back connection to another NIC on Port 0, no
switch,
does
it still autoneg to 100?
Connected back to back w/
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
If you have a back to back connection to another NIC on Port 0, no
switch,
does
it still autoneg to 100?
Connected back to back w/ another box w/ a GigE NIC, it now does
1000baseTX:
igb0:
Hi guys,
I just got on my hands today a NEHALEM system:
2 x 5560 Nehalem CPU (2.8GHz, 8MB cache memory, 6.4GT/sec [QPI])
12GB 1333Mhz DDR3 Memory
1 x 500GB SATA HDD
FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE/amd64 install fine, however I seemed to be
having problems w/ its built-in Intel NICs:
igb0:
I have not seen a problem like this ever, what is the link partner
of each NIC and if you switch the ports what happens?
We have Nehalem's in the validation lab but I have not had an
excuse to install on one so far, I guess now I do :)
Jack
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Mars G Miro
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not seen a problem like this ever, what is the link partner
of each NIC and if you switch the ports what happens?
Hi Jack,
They're connected to a GigE switch. It was just one w/ the first
NIC, but having seen that
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems
with
82576 down in my group here. The way link works I can be about 99.9% sure
in saying its not the driver. Its preproduction so there are lots of
So it wasn't identified during install but was in the kernel you built
afterward, is that
what you're saying? Even if that's true I don't think its relevant to the
failure.
I have made a couple queries internally, there are a lot of variations on
Nehalem
systems, at least one other engineer in my
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
So it wasn't identified during install but was in the kernel you built
afterward, is that
what you're saying? Even if that's true I don't think its relevant to the
failure.
Ahm no, sysinstall said something like:
igb0:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:50:45AM +0800, Mars G Miro wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am at Intel you know, and even we don't seem to have any systems
with
82576 down in my group here. The way link works I can be about 99.9% sure
in
12 matches
Mail list logo
