On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:37:26PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> We've had a series of Broadcomm bge(4) network interfaces that would
> arbitrarily stop working if hardwired to 100-full, but that are doing
> just fine when allowed to autoneg. Switches are mostly HP Procurve if
> that makes any di
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've never paid much attention to what ifconfig says, or what
>> managed switches say, as far as speed or duplex negotiation go.
>> Most vendors do not play well together. I'll repeat that because
>> it needs repeating: most vendors do not play well together.
>> Example
> I've never paid much attention to what ifconfig says, or what
> managed switches say, as far as speed or duplex negotiation go.
> Most vendors do not play well together. I'll repeat that because
> it needs repeating: most vendors do not play well together.
> Example: anyone familiar with Cisco C
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Anton - Valqk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Well,
> the card is connected to a switch that is manageble and the port is set to
> 10Mbit Full duplex on purpose.
Your ifconfig output below shows halfduplex!
> I'm not setting
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Anton - Valqk wrote:
> Well,
> the card is connected to a switch that is manageble and the port is set to
> 10Mbit Full duplex on purpose.
>
> I'm not setting the port speed manual - is that a problem when the port is
> not 100mbit/fd?
> This is the ifcon
Anton - Valqk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the card is connected to a switch that is manageble and the port is set
> to 10Mbit Full duplex on purpose.
>
> I'm not setting the port speed manual - is that a problem when the port
> is not 100mbit/fd?
If you select the port parameters manually (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well,
the card is connected to a switch that is manageble and the port is set to
10Mbit Full duplex on purpose.
I'm not setting the port speed manual - is that a problem when the port is not
100mbit/fd?
This is the ifconfig output:
fxp0: flags=18843
Anton - Valqk wrote:
> netstat -ni
> NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts
> Oerrs Coll
> fxp0 1500 00:08:c7:5b:53:5f 4504986 0 2093233
> 0 185206
Hmmm... what's the output of 'ifconfig fxp0'? Are you by any chance
running this card in half-duplex
Hi there group.
I'm having trouble with a fxp0 card.
When I ping it there are little lost packets, also the netstat -ni shows
a lot collisions.
The polling is enabled:
kern.polling.idlepoll_sleeping: 1
kern.polling.stalled: 422
kern.polling.suspect: 937141
kern.polling.phase: 0
kern.polling.ena
