On Fri, 25 May 2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in the
process of releasing a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant difference
in thruput between the 2 versions in a
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput between the 2
versions in a controlled environment -
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput between the 2
versions in a controlled environment - aproximately 94mbs on a
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
You are going to get asked this, so I'll ask first.
Whats the reason behind not running a more recent STABLE? I understand
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:51 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Why are you releasing a new product on an already unsupported version?
6.2 is the version you really need to be moving to not 6.1.
FreeBSD 6.1 is not unsupported - far from it. When 6.1 was released, it
was designated as an Extended
Subject: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput between the 2
Stephen Clark wrote:
Dominic Marks wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
You are going to get asked this, so I'll ask first.
Whats the reason
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
[..]
He has been comparing the 6.1 system to 4.9 system for a couple of weeks
and continues to insist the 6.1 version is much slower.
[..]
In subjective tests RD has done using the following setup we see no
problem:
freebsd+firefox --100mbs
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of our testers has the same setup but is using winblows/ie in place of
freebsd+firefox and subjectively says the 6.1 system is slower than the
4.9 system.
I was just wandering if there were any tunables that might cause
- Original Message -
From: Gavin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD 6.1 is not unsupported - far from it. When 6.1 was released, it
was designated as an Extended support branch, and is currently
scheduled to be supported (from a security point of view) after support
for 6.2 is dropped.
Dominic Marks wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
You are going to get asked this, so I'll ask first.
Whats the reason behind not running a more
On Friday 25 May 2007 15:05, Stephen Clark wrote:
We have a person that is testing the both system inhouse surfing out
over the internet on our T1 link and he complains that he is consistently
seeing the 6.1 version being much slower than the
4.9 version (on the same hardware).
FreeBSD cannot
Stephen Clark wrote:
The appliance is basically a firewall/nat/vpn device. We started on 6.1
last year and it has
taken us a while to get things tested, plus I don't like to use a brand
new release. If we go to
a later release it means we have to do complete regression testing, etc.
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 03:17:40PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 14:51 +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Why are you releasing a new product on an already unsupported version?
6.2 is the version you really need to be moving to not 6.1.
FreeBSD 6.1 is not unsupported - far
Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in thruput between the 2
versions in a controlled
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 08:05:15AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello List,
We have a network appliance that is currently based on 4.9. We are in
the process of releasing
a new version based on 6.1 stable.
In our testing using nttcp thru the appliance we see insignifant
difference in
16 matches
Mail list logo
