On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:40:51AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 15:00:07 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 10), Ulrich Spörlein said:
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 13:49:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich
On 2010/02/10 17:58, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi guys,
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n
is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet).
It somehow does not manifest when using a simple list and sorting on a
specific column, but it always happens
Hi guys,
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n
is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet).
It somehow does not manifest when using a simple list and sorting on a
specific column, but it always happens to me when using it in
combination with
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi guys,
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n
is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet).
It somehow does not manifest when using a simple list and sorting on a
specific
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi guys,
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n
is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet).
It somehow does not manifest when using a simple list and sorting on a
specific
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 13:49:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi guys,
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n
is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet).
It somehow does
In the last episode (Feb 10), Ulrich Spörlein said:
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 13:49:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n
is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 15:00:07 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 10), Ulrich Spörlein said:
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 13:49:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me
