Fwd: [Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-15 Thread Dan Epure
- Forwarded message from Dan Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:11:43 +0200 From: Dan Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7 The /etc/defaults/devfs.rules version is: # $FreeBSD: src

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-12 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Christian, Christian S.J. Peron wrote: Please try the attached patch. I have committed this to head and it somehow slipped through the cracks in terms of an MFC (patch /etc/defaults/devfs.rules) Do we need to expose /dev/ptmx as well? A

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:25:08 +0200 From: Dan Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7 Thank you for your answer. This is not Xin Li's scenario. Description

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Dan Epure
@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7 Thank you for your answer. This is not Xin Li's scenario. Description: the host of the jail - H (192.168.168.2/24) the jail running on H - J (192.168.168.254/32) the testing system - T (192.168.168.253/24) 1. I start

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Dan Epure wrote: I just used the patch and it is working. Good to hear. I have submitted the request to get this merged to RELENG_7. Thanks for the quick response. -- Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Vlad GALU
On 11/11/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Dan Epure wrote: I just used the patch and it is working. Good to hear. I have submitted the request to get this merged to RELENG_7. Thanks for the quick response. Unfortunately, this

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:17:31PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote: On 11/11/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Dan Epure wrote: I just used the patch and it is working. Good to hear. I have submitted the request to get this merged to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Vlad GALU
On 11/12/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:17:31PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote: On 11/11/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Dan Epure wrote: I just used the patch and it is working.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:14:14AM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote: [..] This one: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/038054.html Thanks! Ah.. ok. At first glance this doesn't look like a problem. This is actually looks like a side effect of devices which

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-11 Thread Vlad GALU
On 11/12/07, Christian S.J. Peron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:14:14AM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote: [..] This one: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/038054.html Thanks! Ah.. ok. At first glance this doesn't look like a problem.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7]

2007-11-08 Thread Dan Epure
I can provide more info on request. - Forwarded message from Dan Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:25:08 +0200 From: Dan Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7 Thank you

Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7

2007-11-08 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Epure wrote: Thank you for your answer. This is not Xin Li's scenario. That's true, these are different scenarios. I think it is caused by some devfs.rules(5) configuration issue, as if you mount the whole devfs into /dev, you will have

Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7

2007-11-07 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:19 +0200, Dan Epure wrote: Hi All, I'm using on the host system (7.0-BETA2): #sysctl kern.pts.enable kern.pts.enable: 1 I have no problem at all. The jail is also 7.0-BETA2 The problem is inside the jail openpty() can not allocate the pty: === cut here ===

Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7

2007-11-07 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 16:21 +0200, Vlad GALU wrote: On 11/7/07, Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:19 +0200, Dan Epure wrote: Hi All, snip I think the problem is related to restrictions imposed by the jail. Please advise. Gepu This is because you

Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7

2007-11-07 Thread Dan Epure
Thank you for your answer. This is not Xin Li's scenario. Description: the host of the jail - H (192.168.168.2/24) the jail running on H - J (192.168.168.254/32) the testing system - T (192.168.168.253/24) 1. I start the ssh daemon on H: === cut here === H# /usr/sbin/sshd -d debug1: sshd

Re: openpty() and jail in RELENG_7

2007-11-07 Thread Vlad GALU
On 11/7/07, Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:19 +0200, Dan Epure wrote: Hi All, I'm using on the host system (7.0-BETA2): #sysctl kern.pts.enable kern.pts.enable: 1 I have no problem at all. The jail is also 7.0-BETA2 The problem is inside the jail

openpty() and jail in RELENG_7

2007-11-06 Thread Dan Epure
Hi All, I'm using on the host system (7.0-BETA2): #sysctl kern.pts.enable kern.pts.enable: 1 I have no problem at all. The jail is also 7.0-BETA2 The problem is inside the jail openpty() can not allocate the pty: === cut here === debug1: monitor_child_preauth: test2 has been authenticated by