page fault in e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_base_generic() during SIOCAIFADDR

2010-09-01 Thread pluknet
Hi. This is reproducible from time to time on boot when handling SIOCAIFADDR called from ifconfig on igb on fresh (and not so fresh) 8-STABLE. How can I help with debugging? Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive sleep mutex igb0 (IGB Core Lock) r = 0

Re: page fault in e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_base_generic() during SIOCAIFADDR

2010-09-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:53:09 am pluknet wrote: Hi. This is reproducible from time to time on boot when handling SIOCAIFADDR called from ifconfig on igb on fresh (and not so fresh) 8-STABLE. How can I help with debugging? Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable

Re: page fault in e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_base_generic() during SIOCAIFADDR

2010-09-01 Thread pluknet
On 1 September 2010 20:06, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:53:09 am pluknet wrote: Hi. This is reproducible from time to time on boot when handling SIOCAIFADDR called from ifconfig on igb on fresh (and not so fresh) 8-STABLE. How can I help with

Re: page fault in e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_base_generic() during SIOCAIFADDR

2010-09-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:11:31 pm pluknet wrote: On 1 September 2010 20:06, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:53:09 am pluknet wrote: Hi. This is reproducible from time to time on boot when handling SIOCAIFADDR called from ifconfig on igb

Re: page fault in e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_base_generic() during SIOCAIFADDR

2010-09-01 Thread Jack Vogel
LOL, if its the VF its pretty new code, PLEASE anyone, if this is the case make it clear in the title somewhere, ok? Thanks. Jack On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:24 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:11:31 pm pluknet wrote: On 1 September 2010 20:06, John

Re: page fault in e1000_clear_hw_cntrs_base_generic() during SIOCAIFADDR

2010-09-01 Thread pluknet
On 1 September 2010 21:31, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote: LOL, if its the VF its pretty new code, PLEASE anyone, if this is the case make it clear in the title somewhere, ok? Thanks. Sure, this is the VF. I'm sorry, I didn't mention this directly. -- wbr, pluknet