On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> = > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
> = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing
> = > will panic.
> =
> = I forg
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
= > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
= > memory pressure, i.e.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > = > How will it break them? swap backing
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:17:14PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > = > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
> > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> = > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
> = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing
> = > will panic.
> =
> = I forg
On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
= > How will it break them? swap backing only touches swap if there is
= > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing
= > will panic.
=
= I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its
= consumers. The
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md a
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
> > is
> > = > currently the _de
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:59:46AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
> > is
> > = > currently the _de
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> = > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety
> is
> = > currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)...
> = Bad default.
>
> Filing a P
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>> The strings "panic" and "-o reserve" are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor
>> in
>> rc.conf(5)... Is one supposed to look elsewhere?
>
> Yes, mdconfig, which is what creates the device (mdmfs is a legacy
>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>> The strings "panic" and "-o reserve" are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor
>> in
>> rc.conf(5)... Is one supposed to look elsewhere?
>
> Yes, mdconfig, which is what creates the device (mdmfs is a legacy
>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:46:57PM -0500, Michael Proto wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >> The strings "panic" and "-o reserve" are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor
> >> in
> >> rc.conf(5)... Is one supposed to look elsewhere?
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 16:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> = Documented in the manpage, use swap backing or reserve enough space.
> =
> = Kris
>
> The strings "panic" and "-o reserve" are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor in
> rc.
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 16:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
= Documented in the manpage, use swap backing or reserve enough space.
=
= Kris
The strings "panic" and "-o reserve" are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor in
rc.conf(5)... Is one supposed to look elsewhere?
Worse, the use of malloc-based m
Documented in the manpage, use swap backing or reserve enough space.
Kris
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:59:08AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> The memory-mounted /tmp filled up on this 6.2-PRERELEASE system (as of Nov 7).
>
> Unfortunately, instead of the process existing due to ENOSPC, the entire
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Alex Kozlov wrote:
= > Yes, I switched to swap-backed md already. But the malloc-based variety is
= > currently the _default_ (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)...
= Bad default.
Filing a PR.
= > Creation of a 2Gb malloc-based md should've failed on a machine with
= >
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:48:11PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 11:41, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> = On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:59:08AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> = > /tmp's space allocation (after reboot) is as follows:
> = >
> = > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 11:41, Alex Kozlov wrote:
= On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:59:08AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= > /tmp's space allocation (after reboot) is as follows:
= >
= > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
= > /dev/md0 2026030 3552 1860396 0%/tmp
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:59:08AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> /tmp's space allocation (after reboot) is as follows:
>
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/md0 2026030 3552 1860396 0%/tmp
>
> Note, that it is supposed to hold 2Gb, but was filled up a
The memory-mounted /tmp filled up on this 6.2-PRERELEASE system (as of Nov 7).
Unfortunately, instead of the process existing due to ENOSPC, the entire
system paniced:
[...]
g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=982335488, length=131072)]error = 28
g_vfs_done():md0[WRITE(offset=982466560, length=131072)
21 matches
Mail list logo
