pls.which.way.to.go?

2006-11-09 Thread Wlodek Kraterski
I'm running now 4.11 and I'm quite happy. However, I did get my hands on new box: IBM x230 with 2X1gig intel 6x.X.SCSI.X.33.6 and 3 gig of ram. My old server is basicaly a web server with cgi and php, hosting my own web sites. I would like to upgrade the whole

Re: pls.which.way.to.go?

2006-11-09 Thread Kay Abendroth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I would upgrade to 5.5 first. Then it's up to you, but waiting for 6.3 is probably not a bad idea, before going further up the hill to 6.x. Wlodek Kraterski wrote: I'm running now 4.11 and I'm quite happy. However, I

Re: pls.which.way.to.go?

2006-11-09 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Kay Abendroth wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I would upgrade to 5.5 first. Then it's up to you, but waiting for 6.3 is probably not a bad idea, before going further up the hill to 6.x. Wlodek Kraterski wrote: I'm running now 4.11 and I'm quite happy.

Re: pls.which.way.to.go?

2006-11-09 Thread Frank Mayhar
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:20 +0100, Kay Abendroth wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I would upgrade to 5.5 first. Then it's up to you, but waiting for 6.3 is probably not a bad idea, before going further up the hill to 6.x. Please don't top-post. And I disagree. He

Re: pls.which.way.to.go?

2006-11-09 Thread Tom Samplonius
I would upgrade to 5.5 first. Then it's up to you, but waiting for 6.3 is probably not a bad idea, before going further up the hill to 6.x. Please don't top-post. And I disagree. He should go straight to 6.2. If he's going to go to the trouble of upgrading, he should go straight