On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:19:02 +0900, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob wrote:
Brian Szymanski wrote:
Did you try any machines that used Hyperthreading? I'd be interested to
see how those machines fare based on the number of logical and real
CPUs.
Although people suggest -j4 as optimal in general
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:35AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
Would all this work for 'make index' for the ports also? Or is this more
io bound?
I can't test this myself, because my laptop is to slow for making these
tests any fun.
Based on my tests, 'make index' is only faster with -j on
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:28:55 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:35AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
Would all this work for 'make index' for the ports also? Or is this more
io bound?
I can't test this myself, because my laptop is to slow for making these
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:19:02 +0900, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
time(minutes) * speed(MHz) * nproc / 1000 MHz
Looking at your examples, it seems you divide by 1e5, not by 1000. In
other words, buildworld is CPU bound and takes about 6e12 clock
cycles. Use -jnproc.
Nick B
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:14:42AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:28:55 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:35AM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
Would all this work for 'make index' for the ports also? Or is this more
io bound?
I
