HEADS-UP: 11.2-RELEASE cycle starting in one month

2018-03-28 Thread Glen Barber
[Several vendor contacts in BCC.] For those that did not notice the website update adding the 11.2-RELEASE cycle schedule, I apologize for sending this to public lists this late. I thought I had done this, but apparently not. The 11.2-RELEASE release cycle will begin April 20, 2018

Re: Following vendor release cycle (Was: Re: RFC: Upgrade BIND version in RELENG_7 to BIND 9.6.x)

2010-12-19 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/18/2010 21:57, Kostik Belousov wrote: I do not question your decision of upgrading or leaving the legacy version of BIND in the legacy branch of FreeBSD src. You know that, and I know that. :) I just wanted to be sure that no one got the impression that anyone other than me was

Following vendor release cycle (Was: Re: RFC: Upgrade BIND version in RELENG_7 to BIND 9.6.x)

2010-12-18 Thread Doug Barton
branch of FreeBSD. Hopefully the reasoning for this is obvious, we want to avoid POLA violations. Actually not. My own POV is that we should follow the vendor release cycle, and not the FreeBSD release cycle, for the contributed software. I do not advocate immediate upgrade of the third-party

Re: Following vendor release cycle (Was: Re: RFC: Upgrade BIND version in RELENG_7 to BIND 9.6.x)

2010-12-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
of the contributed software consistent throughout a given RELENG_$N branch of FreeBSD. Hopefully the reasoning for this is obvious, we want to avoid POLA violations. Actually not. My own POV is that we should follow the vendor release cycle, and not the FreeBSD release cycle, for the contributed

Release Cycle for 8.1-RELEASE...

2010-05-17 Thread Ken Smith
Just FYI, we are about a week away from starting code freeze for the 8.1-RELEASE release cycle. Since sometimes that means stable/8 gets a little less reliable due to higher than normal levels of developer activity I'll adjust the branch to say it is 8.1-PRERELEASE now. The target schedule

Beginning the 7.3-RELEASE release cycle...

2010-01-23 Thread Ken Smith
Just a quick note to say we're beginning the release cycle for 7.3-RELEASE. Code freeze on stable/7 began now, and stable/7 has been adjusted to say that it is 7.3-PRERELEASE to reflect that. More details will follow but this is the current target schedule: 01/22: code freeze

Re: release cycle

2007-06-05 Thread Chris
On 04/06/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris wrote: So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of FreeBSD? I can't help but get the impression that you're spoiling for a fight here, so

Re: release cycle

2007-06-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:10:03PM +0100, Chris wrote: On 04/06/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris wrote: So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of FreeBSD? I can't help but

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Chris
://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will be later than that. The plans to start the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also impact this. At BSDCan, Ken Smith mentioned that 7.0 is due to be branched in July and released in Aug/Sep, with 6.3 quickly following (perhaps even overlapping so

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Chris
On 02/06/07, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 2, 2007, at 3:45 , Chris wrote: Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be upgrading freebsd on their servers every few

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Chris
nominally be due around July but the lack of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will be later than that. The plans to start the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also impact this. At BSDCan, Ken Smith mentioned that 7.0 is due to be branched in July

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Doug Barton
Chris wrote: So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of FreeBSD? I can't help but get the impression that you're spoiling for a fight here, so let me ask you to take step 1, which is relax a

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
+1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will be later than that. The plans to start the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also impact this. At BSDCan

Re: release cycle

2007-06-04 Thread Paul Allen
From Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:55:01PM -0700: Chris wrote: So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of FreeBSD? You are focusing on released version numbers when

Re: release cycle

2007-06-02 Thread Chris
the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also impact this. At BSDCan, Ken Smith mentioned that 7.0 is due to be branched in July and released in Aug/Sep, with 6.3 quickly following (perhaps even overlapping so as to reuse the same ports freeze). The ports tree is not even close to stable enough to release

Re: release cycle

2007-06-02 Thread Fabian Keil
that it will be later than that. The plans to start the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also impact this. At BSDCan, Ken Smith mentioned that 7.0 is due to be branched in July and released in Aug/Sep, with 6.3 quickly following (perhaps even overlapping so as to reuse the same ports freeze). The ports

Re: release cycle

2007-06-02 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On Jun 2, 2007, at 3:45 , Chris wrote: Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be upgrading freebsd on their servers every few months to get this support) if 7.0 and 6.3 are released around the

Re: release cycle

2007-06-02 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:45:26AM +0100, Chris wrote: Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be upgrading freebsd on their servers every few months to get this support) if 7.0 and 6.3 are

Re: release cycle

2007-06-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will be later than that. The plans to start the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also impact this. At BSDCan, Ken Smith mentioned that 7.0 is due to be branched in July and released in Aug/Sep, with 6.3 quickly following (perhaps

release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Volker
reading about all that latest trouble, I think it might not be a bad idea to have a (quick) release cycle and release something like 6.2.1-RELEASE (6.3 is still TBA). I'm considering the latest X.org upgrade being a major upgrade which would justify a release cycle (@ flz: you did a great job

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
On 5/29/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! snip While reading about all that latest trouble, I think it might not be a bad idea to have a (quick) release cycle and release something like 6.2.1-RELEASE (6.3 is still TBA). I'm considering the latest X.org upgrade being a major upgrade which

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Erik Trulsson
will likely not know how to do that. While reading about all that latest trouble, I think it might not be a bad idea to have a (quick) release cycle and release something like 6.2.1-RELEASE (6.3 is still TBA). I'm considering the latest X.org upgrade being a major upgrade which would justify

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread LI Xin
Hi, Erik, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Volker wrote: [...] I know there's a release cycle for 7-CURRENT planned next June but IMHO it can be delayed for some weeks. What does the core and releng team think? It might do good. A quick release cycle

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2007-May-29 12:29:29 +0200, Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A quick release cycle for a release from -STABLE sounds like a bad idea. There have been enough new things that have gone into the 6-STABLE branch that a full release cycle seems warranted. Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, LI Xin wrote: Hi, Erik, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Volker wrote: [...] I know there's a release cycle for 7-CURRENT planned next June but IMHO it can be delayed for some weeks. What does the core and releng team think

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Colin Percival
Bruce A. Mah wrote: We've done point releases in the past but only in cases where there were severe problems and/or regressions with released versions. Look at the announcements and release notes for 4.6.2-RELEASE and 5.2.1-RELEASE...these were the two most recent instances where we did

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Bruce A. Mah
if we never had to do another point release again, since we have to do probably half the work of a normal release cycle but it's completely unexpected and unscheduled. BTW I finally added some mention of freebsd-update(8) to the section of the release notes that talks about upgrading FreeBSD

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:18:51PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: Voker, I think with ports freeze still the case, they can't release a new version before sorting all Xorg 7.2 issues IMHO. The freeze has been lifted. OTOH things are still settling down. mcl

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will be later than that. The plans to start the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also impact

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Volker
On 05/29/07 17:26, Bruce A. Mah wrote: And that's just the src/ part. The original poster was mostly concerned about the X.org upgrade, which as we all know lives in the ports/ tree. If we were to do a point release we'd basically require a complete port freeze and package build run. I

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Scott Long
Colin Percival wrote: Bruce A. Mah wrote: We've done point releases in the past but only in cases where there were severe problems and/or regressions with released versions. Look at the announcements and release notes for 4.6.2-RELEASE and 5.2.1-RELEASE...these were the two most recent

Re: release cycle

2007-05-29 Thread Colin Percival
Scott Long wrote: Colin Percival wrote: I point releases have been obsoleted by errata notices. In the past when X.Y.Z-RELEASE has happened, it has been because of critical bugs in the X.Y-RELEASE which there wasn't any other mechanism to fix. Now that we have errata noticed and FreeBSD

FreeBSD 6.2 Release Cycle

2006-09-15 Thread Ken Smith
FYI - we have begun the release cycle for FreeBSD-6.2. Code freeze on the RELENG_6 branch started last week. For people in the habit of tracking RELENG_6 you will start to notice various pieces of it that start saying 6.2 for version numbers (despite 6.2 not being officially released) as we

FreeBSD-5.4 Release Cycle starting in 1 week.

2005-02-23 Thread Ken Smith
The FreeBSD-5.4 Release Cycle will begin with a code freeze one week from today (March 2, 2005). Since the Developers tend to be a bit more active during the week before a code freeze and the development branch can be a bit less stable than normal due to the extra activity we will mark

Re: Beginning FreeBSD-4.11 Release Cycle

2004-12-01 Thread Joan Picanyol
* Ken Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041201 12:39]: This is expected to be the last of the FreeBSD-4.X releases, and is meant to provide current 4.X users with a little more time to migrate to FreeBSD-5.X. Is it known if this will be an Extended Release? Precisely, what will be the EOL date for

Re: Beginning FreeBSD-4.11 Release Cycle

2004-12-01 Thread Ken Smith
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:24:44PM +0100, Joan Picanyol wrote: * Ken Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041201 12:39]: This is expected to be the last of the FreeBSD-4.X releases, and is meant to provide current 4.X users with a little more time to migrate to FreeBSD-5.X. Is it known if this

Beginning FreeBSD-4.11 Release Cycle

2004-11-30 Thread Ken Smith
The release cycle for FreeBSD-4.11 will be starting shortly, with a target release date of January 24th, 2005. A tentative schedule is available, though not all of the dates for the various steps have been set. Throughout the release cycle the schedule will be updated and available here