On 7/8/10 11:13 PM, David Adam wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote:
On 7/8/10 10:24 PM, David Adam wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote:
What caught my interest is if I attempt to log in from a machine
where I do not have my key or an incorrect key, I see nothing logged
in au
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 07:42:15PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> ...
> What caught my interest is if I attempt to log in from a machine where I
> do not have my key or an incorrect key, I see nothing logged in auth.log
> about a failed login attempt. If I attempt with an invalid username, as
> e
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 7/8/10 10:24 PM, David Adam wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote:
> > > What caught my interest is if I attempt to log in from a machine
> > > where I do not have my key or an incorrect key, I see nothing logged
> > > in auth.log about a fa
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote:
> I've been seeing quite a bit of ssh bruteforce attacks which appear to be
> dictionary-based. That's fine; I have proper measures in place, such as
> key-only access, bruteforce tables for PF, and so on; though some of the
> attacks are delaying login attem
On 7/8/10 10:24 PM, David Adam wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote:
I've been seeing quite a bit of ssh bruteforce attacks which appear to be
dictionary-based. That's fine; I have proper measures in place, such as
key-only access, bruteforce tables for PF, and so on; though some of the
Hi,
I've been seeing quite a bit of ssh bruteforce attacks which appear to
be dictionary-based. That's fine; I have proper measures in place, such
as key-only access, bruteforce tables for PF, and so on; though some of
the attacks are delaying login attempts, bypassing the bruteforce rules,
