Graywane [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said:
Yes, it is security by obscurity and no, most people thinking about security
on the net do not believe it is an effective technique to secure a site. You
secure a site by:
Security by obscurity is a bad thing to _rely_ on, but why make it any
easier
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:22:13AM -0500, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
Graywane [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said:
Yes, it is security by obscurity and no, most people thinking about security
on the net do not believe it is an effective technique to secure a site. You
secure a site by:
Security
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said:
Making it easy for the _administrator_ to get information that is
useful for administration is a good thing.
This can be done without providing the same information to an
attacker.
Think about the audit for vulnerable versions of SSH using
There is little sense to post this back, anyway I want
to make things clear.
It's really incredible how a few people can laught on something
they don't understand.
Please try to understand what I'm saying
This super secret place wouldn't happen to be:
Received: from astral.isec.com.br
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:28:36AM -0300, Duwde (Fabio V. Dias) wrote:
I don't think this is a good aproach. Nor does many people on the net
thinking about security. And no, this ISN'T security by obscurity, I
just don't like to let anyone know more than they need. If you don't
care, I don't
