On 3/3/2016 1:46 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mike Tancsa writes:
>> I noticed on a server that I updated on Friday that incorporates
>> r295367, some lightweight clients that were using aes128-cbc are now
>> failing to connect. Is this a planned change ? If so, perhaps a
Mike Tancsa writes:
> I noticed on a server that I updated on Friday that incorporates
> r295367, some lightweight clients that were using aes128-cbc are now
> failing to connect. Is this a planned change ? If so, perhaps a heads
> up in UPDATING ?
Please file a bug and send me
Hi,
I noticed on a server that I updated on Friday that incorporates
r295367, some lightweight clients that were using aes128-cbc are now
failing to connect. Is this a planned change ? If so, perhaps a heads
up in UPDATING ?
e.g. from an older client
ssh -c aes128-cbc