Hi,
>
> What's the actual reallife performance benefits from virtio?
> Twofold,
> threefold, more, less?
>
A magnitude or more. I can push 6-7Gbs through vtnet vs. <400Mbs with
the emulated e1000. The best advice of course is just to try it out
in your environment. It may not matter dependin
On 27 November 2012 13:25, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
>
>> On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>>> On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
i
On 27/11/2012 23:22, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Holden"
To: "Sergey Kandaurov"
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:49:07 PM
Subject: Re: virtio for 9.1-R
On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Holden"
> To: "Sergey Kandaurov"
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:49:07 PM
> Subject: Re: virtio for 9.1-R
>
> On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> &g
On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
> On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe Holden wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
>>> isn't going to be included given that it works reasonabl
On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
isn't going to be included given that it works reasonable well (and is
optional anyway, so not likely to be detrimental)?
On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe Holden wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
> isn't going to be included given that it works reasonable well (and is
> optional anyway, so not likely to be detrimental)?
virtio appeared in stable/9 a bit after
Hi guys,
I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
isn't going to be included given that it works reasonable well (and is
optional anyway, so not likely to be detrimental)?
Thanks,
Joe
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
