conf/50000: ntpdate not ran before (x)ntpd (fwd)

Colleagues, Wow, what a wonderful milestone! ;-))) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Linking with SSl librarie sunder 4.8-RC

Just updated the system to 4.8-RC (supped at aroudn 4pm GMT today). It all buil, installs and runs fine. But now when compiling code (which was building fine on a 4.7-STABLE from december) I get a host of errors: /usr/lib/libssl.so: undefined reference to `EVP_DigestFinal_ex' /usr/lib/libssl.so:

Ignore last...

Just found out I have to add -lcrypto to it. Would this be worth mentioning in updating ? -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message

Re: HEADSUP: XFree86 4.3.0 update

Patch works great on a March 14th 11:30am CST cvsup running on a AMD Duron with a ATI Radeon 8500LE 128MB with XFree 4.3.0. glxinfo reports direct rendering: YES, and my dmesg shows the card being initialized. Best of all, games are starting up now. Note, I recompiled the kernel as well as

Re: Spurrious backquote character

--- Dave Uhring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 13 March 2003 03:42 pm, Brian O'Shea wrote: Greetings, I am running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE with XFree86 4.2.1 and have noticed a strange effect. Every so often a spurrious backquote ` character is generated when I am typing. Dell

Re: ifconfig destroy

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Brooks Davis wrote: The problem was, during my experimentation I ended up exhausting tun* pseudo-devs because they never got cleaned up. Nothing in tun(4) seemed to help and 'destroy' and 'deletetunnel' from ifconfig(8) aren't right. tun devices can't be destroyed at

only 1 processor shown in top?

freebsd heads.. I have an HP kayak machine (dual 300MHz processors) Installed 4.7-Release and just updated with makeworld FreeBSD beast 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #0: Fri Mar 14 13:19:17 EST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEAST i386 from dmesg, I get: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor

Re: only 1 processor shown in top?

On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:57:18PM -0500, jason wrote: freebsd heads.. I have an HP kayak machine (dual 300MHz processors) Installed 4.7-Release and just updated with makeworld FreeBSD beast 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #0: Fri Mar 14 13:19:17 EST 2003 [EMAIL

Re: only 1 processor shown in top?

On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, at 14:57 [=GMT-0500], jason wrote: freebsd heads.. I have an HP kayak machine (dual 300MHz processors) Installed 4.7-Release and just updated with makeworld FreeBSD beast 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #0: Fri Mar 14 13:19:17 EST 2003 [EMAIL

Re: only 1 processor shown in top?

ah yes, sorry for not noticing that.. thanks!! PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 33003 root 10 0 664K 544K wait 1 0:00 1.30% 0.59% make 32499 jason 28 0 1900K 1136K CPU1 0 0:00 0.77% 0.49% top 119 jason 2 0 5292K

[LONG] 4.7-stable freeing free block panic

Hey all, File server running 4.7-stable (02Nov2002) panic'd today with: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block. Here is the back trace for that system: nitrogen# gdb -k /usr/src/sys/compile/DELL_6450/kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.0 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

wierd messages printed to screen during boot.

For anyone with any idea whats going on with my machine... here is the output of uname -a; reeBSD celiana.celiana.net 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Mon Mar 10 01:08:11 PST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/CELIANA i386 If anyone can help with what is going on or what these