8.0-BETA3: make WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB=yes buildworld broken

2009-08-29 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Hi! WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB= knob is documented in src.conf(5) as feature useful for nanobsb build to skip *.a libraries. In 8.0-BETA3, make buildworld breaks in 3 seconds after start when this knob is used: cc -O2 -pipe -DNEED_SOLARIS_BOOLEAN

7.2-STABLE: Wiring down umass devices to uhubs

2009-08-29 Thread Andre Albsmeier
[This is on 7.2-STABLE] I have a USB card reader which gives me 4 da drives. I was able to wire them down so they appear as: scbus3 on umass-sim0 bus 0: Generic USB SD Reader 1.00 at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da30,pass30) Generic USB CF Reader 1.01 at scbus3 target 0 lun 1 (da31,pass31)

Re: 8.0-BETA3/i386: make WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes buildworld broken

2009-08-29 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2009.08.30 01:34:43 +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: In 8.0-BETA3, make WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes buildworld breaks in 15 minutes after start: I'm pretty sure WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes hasn't worked with buildworld since 7.x, so this is nothing new. You need to specify it with installworld, not

Re: 8.0-BETA3/i386: make WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes buildworld broken

2009-08-29 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 08:47:23PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: In 8.0-BETA3, make WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes buildworld breaks in 15 minutes after start: I'm pretty sure WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes hasn't worked with buildworld since 7.x, so this is nothing new. You need to specify it with

Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a

2009-08-29 Thread Richard Mahlerwein
(Sorry, update to subject to be something) 3 weeks ago: I upgraded from 7.1-PRELEASE to -stable and all seemed fine until I rebooted out of single user mode after doing make installworld and mergemaster.  At that point, near the end of the boot sequence I got a core dump, apparently triggered by

(no subject)

2009-08-29 Thread Richard Mahlerwein
3 weeks ago: I upgraded from 7.1-PRELEASE to -stable and all seemed fine until I rebooted out of single user mode after doing make installworld and mergemaster. At that point, near the end of the boot sequence I got a core dump, apparently triggered by devd. Fatal trap 12: page fault

Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a

2009-08-29 Thread Marat N.Afanasyev
Richard Mahlerwein wrote: (Sorry, update to subject to be something) 3 weeks ago: I upgraded from 7.1-PRELEASE to -stable and all seemed fine until I rebooted out of single user mode after doing make installworld and mergemaster. At that point, near the end of the boot sequence I got a core

Re: (no subject)

2009-08-29 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Richard Mahlerwein mahle...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm at a loss. Google's been of little help, and searching these lists hasn't turned up much either. Does anyone have a further recommendation on what to do, try, test or change? BTW, I'm GENERIC.

Re: (no subject)

2009-08-29 Thread Richard Mahlerwein
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Torfinn Ingolfsen torfinn.ingolf...@broadpark.no wrote: Do you have any kmod's from ports on that system? Loaded in loader.conf maybe? If so, try to no load them and see what happens. HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen Addendum: While I found I can do a

Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a

2009-08-29 Thread Richard Mahlerwein
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Marat N.Afanasyev ama...@ksu.ru wrote: From: Marat N.Afanasyev ama...@ksu.ru Subject: Re: Fatal Trap 12 in various processes always at address 0x3030313a To: mahle...@yahoo.com Cc: FreeBSD-Stable freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 6:59 PM

Perennial suggestion to split freebsd-stable into version-specific lists

2009-08-29 Thread Doug Barton
Howdy, I make this suggestion every time there is a new major release coming, maybe this time will be the one! :) One could argue that with the 2 active stable branches that we have now the freebsd-stable@ mailing list is already quite confusing. Adding a third (8-STABLE) will make it much more

Re: Perennial suggestion to split freebsd-stable into version-specific lists

2009-08-29 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: ... Thus, my suggestion. Split what is currently freebsd-stable into one list per branch. This year I even have a better suggestion for the names, freebsd-6@, freebsd-7@, and freebs...@. After the flag day mail sent