I had the following crop up recently in 8-STABLE/amd64 from end of
November. It's been reported as kern/143184.
lock order reversal:
1st 0xff002f7fb270 zfs (zfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:533
2nd 0xff80803a26e0 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pager.c:311
KDB: stack
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI
On 12:55 Sun 24 Jan , Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Last time I checked ttcp, it was broken with threading. So you have
to build ttcp without threading support or use netperf to check
performance numbers.
That's bad, this evening I will try with netperf.
It seems you have Yukon Extreme
on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of
the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the
correct
offset to use
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 07:07:00PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
I had the following crop up recently in 8-STABLE/amd64 from end of
November. It's been reported as kern/143184.
Basically, page containing the buffer for read(2) is swapped out.
This causes page fault in copyout(9) and entry into vm
It depends on the bandwidth of the bus that it is on and the controller
itself.
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan
Glen Barber a écrit :
Hi,
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
su password prompt is displayed to *stdout* instead of */dev/tty*.
# su user
$ su root -c date /tmp/date 21
(nothing displayed)
$ cat /tmp/date
Password:su: Sorry
$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd8.my.domain 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0:
jhell a écrit :
If you mean for the program to appropriately append or overwrite to a
file you should ( su user -c 'date output 21' ) instead
no, I wanted the log written by the initiator, not the receiver.
Regards,
Cyrille Lefevre
--
mailto:cyrille.lefevre-li...@laposte.net
jhell a écrit :
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:57, glen.j.barber@ wrote:
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
su password prompt is displayed to *stdout* instead of */dev/tty*.
# su user
$ su root -c date /tmp/date 21
(nothing displayed)
$ cat /tmp/date
Password:su: Sorry
$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd8.my.domain
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning of
the drive in sectors, or * to have bsdlabel calculate the correct
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:47:46 +
Krzysztof Dajka alter...@gmail.com wrote:
I did check my keyboard with FreeBSD 7.2 and it wasn't supported either.
Xev also didn't return anything.
Di you try this: http://www.freshports.org/misc/hotkeys/
Perhaps it will work?
There is also this:
On 24 Jan 2010, at 17:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
At this moment, I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards, but I'm
not sure whether they are supported by FreeBSd 8/9. Any suggestions?
I'm actually looking for a replacement for my X-Fi (I have the PCI X-Fi Gamer).
The sound quality
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with
a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100
meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is,
On 13 Nov 2009, at 2:59, Dan Langille wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After upgrading to 8.0-PRERELEASE today, I'm seeing hald at 100% on both
my laptop and my desktop:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
1500 haldaemon 1 118
Hi,
have you tried turning off TCP Segmentation Offloading (net.inet.tcp.tso
sysctl)? That fixed performance issues with some em cards for me.
Lars
On 2010-1-25, at 5:47, Nick Rogers wrote:
I am having similar em interface problems with some of my production
machines running older intel
Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote:
Why you are suggesting /var = 2*RAM? Is it just for saving crash dumps
or anything else? And why so big /tmp? I am running servers with smaller
sizes for years without any problem.
Me too. I usually set up a small memory disk for /tmp.
I never
Kristian Kræmmer Nielsen wrote:
I just updated my kernel from RELEASE_8_0 to RELENG_8 and by rutine I
compare my dmesg -a output to make sure everything still works as expected.
I notices that the ata-driver suddently downgraded the speed of my Intel
ICH5 SATS150 from SATA150 til UDMA133 -
Hi,
have you tried turning off TCP Segmentation Offloading (net.inet.tcp.tso
sysctl)? That fixed performance issues with some em cards for me.
Lars
On 2010-1-25, at 5:47, Nick Rogers wrote:
I am having similar em interface problems with some of my production
machines running older intel
On Mon, January 25, 2010 7:20 am, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
On 13 Nov 2009, at 2:59, Dan Langille wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After upgrading to 8.0-PRERELEASE today, I'm seeing hald at 100% on both
my laptop and my desktop:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE
I have not tried toying with any tcp sysctl. I'm not having performance
problems so much as the interface just stops working entirely, which I would
think has nothing to do with the TCP stack when layer 2 is not functioning?
I'll give it a shot if I can. For the moment I have had to switch to a
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but peak throughput of MV8 with
On 01/25/10 04:19, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
O. Hartmannohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with
which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots
at all ... I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:02:58PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:25:43AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote:
I have not tried toying with any tcp sysctl. I'm not having performance
problems so much as the interface just stops working entirely, which I would
think has nothing to do with the TCP stack when layer 2 is not functioning?
I'm
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=HIPMI=Y
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:25:43AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote:
I have not tried toying with any tcp sysctl. I'm not having performance
problems so much as the interface just stops working entirely, which I
would
think
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
Hi,
On 2010-1-25, at 19:38, Nick Rogers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure you're seeing a checksum offload bug of em(4) but the
bug is easily reproducible in VLAN environments. If the issue is
gone when you disable TX checksum
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:39:01PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
Dear colleagues,
I had a crash durinc rsync to ZFS today:
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196
#1 0xc050c688 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418
#2 0xc050c965 in panic (fmt=Variable fmt is not available.
) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574
#3 0xc08e95ce in
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:04:20PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I had a crash durinc rsync to ZFS today:
Do you have recent 7-STABLE? Not sure if it was the same before MFC,
probably not, because what you see is impossible in case of source I'm
looking at. At the begining
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:41:59 -0600
Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
add the following to /etc/make.conf:
INSTALL_NODEBUG=yes
This is useful. Thanks!
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
PJD On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:04:20PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
PJD Dear colleagues,
PJD
PJD I had a crash durinc rsync to ZFS today:
PJD
PJD Do you have recent 7-STABLE? Not sure if it was the same before MFC,
r...@woozle:/var/crash#
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about
Alexander Motin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM PJD I had a crash durinc rsync to ZFS today:
DM PJD
DM PJD Do you have recent 7-STABLE? Not sure if it was the same before MFC,
DM
DM r...@woozle:/var/crash# uname -a
DM FreeBSD woozle.rinet.ru 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #4: Mon Dec 14
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:45 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 25/01/2010 04:41 Robert Noland said the following:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
offset The offset of the start of the partition from the beginning
of
the drive
Before 8.0-RELEASE, if I ran netstat -rn, it listed a separate route for
each host on the network, along with its MAC address. For example ...
172.20.172.17 00:02:b3:2f:64:6a UHLW1 105712 1500
vlan172595
172.20.172.20 00:1e:c9:bb:7c:a9 UHLW1 1002
As mentioned a while back on the list[1], I worked on getting atacontrol
to spit out SMART statistics for ATA disks. Specifically, this would be
those using the standard ata(4) layer (including ataahci.ko and
similar), but not ahci(4) (ahci.ko), which uses ATA/CAM.
Output resembles the
I've been having a similar problem with my network dropping completely on my
8-STABLE gateway/firewall/fileserver. My setup is a little different, as I
have re0 and ral0 bridged for LAN, and em0 for WAN. I've just turned off TX
checksum offloading to see if that makes any difference.
On Mon, Jan
On 26.01.2010 7:40, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
- All of the code was written by hand; that is to say, there is no code
copied/stolen from smartmontools, as it's released under the GPL.
Hi, Jeremy.
Some time ago i've began the same work, but did not finish it because ENOTIME..
So, did you look to
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:38:26AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 26.01.2010 7:40, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
- All of the code was written by hand; that is to say, there is no code
copied/stolen from smartmontools, as it's released under the GPL.
Hi, Jeremy.
Some time ago i've began the
I have just upgraded to 8-STABLE/amd64 from about 18 hours ago and am
now getting regular (the following pair of messages about every
minute) compaints as follows:
kernel: uma_zalloc_arg: zone mbuf with the following non-sleepable locks held:
kernel: exclusive sleep mutex sp_lock (sp_lock) r = 0
47 matches
Mail list logo
