Re: kern.smp.maxid error on i386 UP [was: powerd / cpufreq question]

2011-04-21 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 20 April 2011 22:29, Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 April 2011 21:02, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: [..] Very happy to test any patches etc. Ouch. Looks like that affects a system with 2 cores as well.

RE: FreeBSD and DELL Perc H200

2011-04-21 Thread Holger Kipp
On 20. April 2011, 22:56 Simon L. B. Nielsen [si...@nitro.dk] wrote On 19 Apr 2011, at 22:16, Holger Kipp wrote: I have to install two production servers from Dell that come with a Perc H 200 controller. Disks are not recognized with 8.2-RELEASE :-( AFAIK Perc H 200 should be supported

Re: Large number of SATA commits (MFCs) to RELENG_8

2011-04-21 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 21/04/2011 05:43 Lystopad Olexandr said the following: But I have 1 question, why needed src/UPDATING? There are a lot of changes in the tree since release date and there are no one in that file. It's for changes that require user attention, like e.g. renaming some important utility or

Re: Large number of SATA commits (MFCs) to RELENG_8

2011-04-21 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:56:04 +0300 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: on 21/04/2011 05:43 Lystopad Olexandr said the following: May be we need another one file, like src/ChangeLog ? ;-) svn log ... Or even http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/ -- Bruce Cran

Re: Large number of SATA commits (MFCs) to RELENG_8

2011-04-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 04/20/2011 19:43, Lystopad Olexandr wrote: May be we need another one file, like src/ChangeLog ? Users who run a -stable branch are expected to read freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org (note, not just subscribe), AND read the commit mail for their branch; just like users who run HEAD are expected

Re: Large number of SATA commits (MFCs) to RELENG_8

2011-04-21 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 21), Doug Barton said: On 04/20/2011 19:43, Lystopad Olexandr wrote: May be we need another one file, like src/ChangeLog ? Users who run a -stable branch are expected to read freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org (note, not just subscribe), AND read the commit mail for

Re: FreeBSD and DELL Perc H200

2011-04-21 Thread Lorenzo Perone
Would have loved to use a stable branch (ie 8.2) instead of development (9.0-CURRENT), though. Especially for the new DELL servers with Perc H200 providing a snapshot with the changes would be greatly appreciated! Hi Holger, Go for 8-STABLE. Works fine for me. No need for CURRENT for

Re: FreeBSD and DELL Perc H200

2011-04-21 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 20/04/2011 21:56, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: Unfortunately the latest official snapshots were before the driver was merged. You could try first just to boot on the curent / FreeBSD 9 snapshots and see if it sees your disks at all. You can get the snapshot from

Re: FreeBSD and DELL Perc H200

2011-04-21 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Holger Kipp wrote: [...] 201102 snapshot is for ia64 and ppc only :-| (and only 9.0-CURRENT) 201101 9.0 snapshots are for amd64, i386 (and 8.2 is only PRERELEASE) [...] Anyway, thanks a lot for your reply. Maybe someone should update the FreeBSD website, because there it is said that

Re: FreeBSD and DELL Perc H200

2011-04-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Vincent Hoffman vi...@unsane.co.uk wrote: On 20/04/2011 21:56, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: Unfortunately the latest official snapshots were before the driver was merged. You could try first just to boot on the curent / FreeBSD 9 snapshots and see if it sees