-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
doing some testing, for now there are following issues left:
1) every execution of service -e casts a bunch of unnecessary
warnings into /var/log/messages:
...
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
doing some testing, for now there are following issues left:
1) every execution of service -e casts a bunch of unnecessary
warnings into /var/log/messages:
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
Marc Fournier wrote:
On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
The pid that is in T state for the ps auxlH.
Different server, last kernel update on Jan 22nd, https process this
time instead
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:25:17 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:28:30 pm Mikhail T. wrote:
On 07.02.2013 13:16, John Baldwin wrote:
Can you get pciconf -lc output?
Here:
hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x
chip=0x11308086
Hello there,
Just a final reminder: the deadline for the reports is this Sunday.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gabor Pali p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Let me call your attention to the approaching deadline of the next
set(s) of FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports. Please consider
submitting a few
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:44:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
Marc Fournier wrote:
On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
The pid that is in T state for the ps auxlH.
Different
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:44:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
Marc Fournier wrote:
On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca
wrote:
The pid that is in T state
Hmm.
I've got IPSEC tunnels from Windows XP and Windows 7 working
to a FreeBSD 8.3 host, using NAT/T.
I'm using the Shrewsoft client: http://www.shrew.net/software
-Kurt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2/15/2013 9:37 AM, Kurt Lidl wrote:
Hmm.
I've got IPSEC tunnels from Windows XP and Windows 7 working
to a FreeBSD 8.3 host, using NAT/T.
I'm using the Shrewsoft client: http://www.shrew.net/software
-Kurt
_
The goal is to do it using only the native Win/7 VPN
On Friday, February 15, 2013 10:21:11 am Rick Macklem wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:44:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
Marc Fournier wrote:
On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and
jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension!
Accidentally I saw that devfs_ruleset seems to be ignored.
If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc.
I set devfs_ruleset = 4; and enforce_statfs = 1; in
Hello,
while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
After jail has been destroyed, the following mountpoint is active:
/dev/gpt/jailname1ROOT on /.jail.jailname1 (ufs, local, read-only)
There was var mounted to /.jail.jailname1/var
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
After jail has been destroyed, the following mountpoint is active:
/dev/gpt/jailname1ROOT on
schrieb Mateusz Guzik am 15.02.2013 17:50 (localtime):
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
After jail has been destroyed, the following mountpoint
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeremy,
thanks for your quick response. If I understand you right, you don't
see any necessity for updating /usr/sbin/service. I'll try to make my
point of view more comprehensible.
Am 15.02.2013 11:57, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
On Fri, Feb 15,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
doing some testing, for now there are following issues left:
1) every execution of service
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
doing some testing, for now
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:20:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
we want to use this script for
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #2 r244942M: Tue Feb 5 21:54:29 CST 2013
k...@dbms.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP
(custom kernel is there to support PPS for my GPS clock)
Attempting to add a generic card that claims to have a Envy24DT chipset
in it; it identifies and loads under the
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:32:57PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'll file a PR for this.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176181
--
| Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org |
| UNIX Systems Administratorhttp://jdc.koitsu.org/ |
| Mountain
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and
jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension!
Accidentally I saw that devfs_ruleset seems to be ignored.
If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc.
I
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:20:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
we want to use this script for
Trying the patch now … but what do you mean by using 'SIGSTOP'? I generally do
a 'kill -HUP' then when that doesn't work 'kill -9' … should Iuse -STOP instead
of 9?
On 2013-02-15, at 5:44 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I think this is the right idea, but in HEAD with the
23 matches
Mail list logo
