Re: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote: Hello all, We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading from 4.x to 6.2-stable: Hi Again, The panics keep happening, so I'm trying alternate

[vfs_bio] Re: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode (with potential cause, fix?)

On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:55:52AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Kai wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote: Hello all, We're running into regular panics

Re: [vfs_bio] Re: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode (with potential cause)

On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:30:20AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:55:52AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Kai wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200

Hook up idmapd to build in 6-stable?

I am beginning to dabble with NFSv4 client functionality. I noticed idmapd is not built in -stable but it has been in -current since src/sbin/Makefile v. 1.163 (13 months ago). Should it be hooked up to the build? Thanks ___

Re: Hook up idmapd to build in 6-stable?

On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 07:44:31PM +, Ceri Davies wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:31:04PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: I am beginning to dabble with NFSv4 client functionality. I noticed idmapd is not built in -stable but it has been in -current since src/sbin/Makefile v. 1.163

Re: Working mini PCIe wireless?

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:02:58PM -0500, Michael Proto wrote: Geoff Buckingham wrote: I recently purchased the Dell I6400 Ubuntu laptop, with the express intent of running FreeBSD on it. My intention was to use this a working machine using PC-BSD, I.E. RELENG_6, limiting

Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core

On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:39:22PM +, Pete French wrote: Just as a followup to this - I soent some time going through all the suggestions and advice that people gave me regarding this problem. It turns out that the newer servers shipped by HP have different cache settings to the older

Re: current zfs tuning in RELENG_7 (AMD64) suggestions ?

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:42:09PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: I gave the AMD64 version of 7.2 RC2 a spin and all installed as expected off the dvd INTEL S3200SHV MB, Core2Duo, 4G of RAM snip The writes are all within the normal variance of the tests except for b). Is there

Re: RFT: ZFS MFC

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 05:02:22PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote: I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can. http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/ The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a VM. Please do not use it with

Re: ZFS booting without partitions (was: ZFS boot on zfs mirror)

I encountered the same symptoms today on both a 32bit and 64bit brand new install using gptzfsboot. It works for me when I use a copy of loader from an 8-current box with zfs support compiled in. I haven't looked into it much yet but it might help you. If you want, you can try the loader I am

Re: ZFS booting without partitions

I'm thinking that too. I spent some time taking stabs at figuring it out yesterday but didn't get anywhere useful. I did try compiling the -current src/sys/boot tree on 7.2 after a couple header tweaks to make it compile but the loader still didn't work. The working loader is the same file

Re: ZFS NAS configuration question

I have a proof of concept system doing this. I started with a 7.2 install on zfs root, compiled world and kernel from 8, took a snapshot and made a clone for the 7.2 install, and proceeded to upgrade the current fs to 8.0. After updating the loader.conf in the 7.2 zfs to point to its own

Re: ZFS booting without partitions

Henri Hennebert wrote: Kip Macy wrote: On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu wrote: I'm thinking that too. I spent some time taking stabs at figuring it out yesterday but didn't get anywhere useful. I did try compiling the -current src/sys/boot tree on 7.2

Re: /boot/loader and RELENG_7 (WAS: gptzfsboot and RELENG_7)

Dan Naumov wrote: Ah, so there is still a (small) piece of 8-CURRENT needed to have a working 7-STABLE zfs boot configuration? I am getting really confused now, if I add LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=yes to my /etc/make.conf, the RELENG_7 system will be built with zfs boot support, but I still need the

Re: pw groupadd/useradd fail when the nscd cache is used for name/group resolution

Michael Proto wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Ulrich Spörleinu...@spoerlein.net wrote: On Thu, 09.07.2009 at 16:13:25 +0300, Vlad Galu wrote: I've stumbled upon this while installing postgres. In /etc/nsswitch.conf I had group: cache files compat and passwd: cache files

Re: Swapping caused by very large (regular) file size

On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:05:38AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday 11 January 2008 10:31:47 pm Peter Jeremy wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:44:20PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote: Ian West wrote: dd if=/dev/zero bs=32768 of=junkfile count=10 seems to do it quite reliably on

Re: nscd again (nis client cache)

I wanted to say Thanks!!! for this example, because before this point I was under the impression that nscd/cached was of no use for NIS clients, only LDAP or maybe other directory systems that I don't use. I tried cache compat as below for passwd and group and it works! Our NIS entries at work

Re: gjournal panic 7.0-RC1

Ivan Voras wrote: Chris wrote: Came back to see box had rebooted itself from a journal related panic. panic: Journal overflow (joffset=49905408 active=499691355136 inactive=4990$ cpuid = 0 AFAIK this means that the journal is too small for your machine - try doubling it until there

How to debug or explain slow gjournal writes?

I am evaluating using gjournal on my servers. This one test system is running 7.0-RELEASE at the moment on a Dell PE2650 with dual 2ghz xeon, ahc0: Adaptec aic7899 Ultra160 SCSI adapter, and some seagate 36g 10k disks. I had the opportunity to try placing the journal consumer device on a

Re: How to debug or explain slow gjournal writes?

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: I am evaluating using gjournal on my servers. This one test system is running 7.0-RELEASE at the moment on a Dell PE2650 with dual 2ghz xeon, ahc0: Adaptec aic7899 Ultra160 SCSI adapter, and some seagate 36g 10k snip

Re: ubsa speed limit

Dominic Fandrey wrote: When I download a single file it seems that the download speed is limited to 32k (raw data as shown by netstat). Under Windows I can reach values around 60k. I can achieve more throughput (though not as much as under Windows), when downloading several files at once.

Re: good/best practices for gmirror and gjournal on a pair of disks?

George Hartzell wrote: I've been running many of my systems for some time now using gmirror on a pair of identical disks, as described by Ralf at: http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ Each disk has single slice that covers almost all of the disk. These slices are combined into the gmirror

Re: Disk access/MPT under ESX3.5

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:02:31AM +0200, Daniel Ponticello wrote: Hello, monitor# camcontrol negotiate 0:0 -W 16 Current Parameters: (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): sync parameter: 0 (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): offset: 0 (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): bus width: 8 bits (pass0:mpt0:0:0:0): disconnection is

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

Bartosz Stec wrote: BTW overall SAMBA performance still sucks on 7.1-pre as much as on RELENG_5 ...:( - 7.5 MB/s peak. 7.5MB is 75% effeciency of a 100mbit card. Not amazing, but not sucks. Where do you see faster performance? Between windows machines on the same hardware or linux

Re: am2 MBs - 4g + SCSI wipes out root partition

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300 JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: am2 MBs - 4g + SCSI wipes out root partition

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:26:29PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:13:16 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200

Re: Disk top usage PIDs

Eduardo Meyer wrote: Hello, I have some serious issue. Sometimes something happens and my disk usage performance find its limit quickly. I follow with gstat and iostat -xw1, and everything usually happens just fine, with %b around 20 and 0 to 1 pending i/o request. Suddely I get 30, 40 pending

Fwd: aac0 issues, Controller is no longer running

Forwarding to list because mail to ema...@freebsd.org bounced at the location it is apparently being forwarded to so I'm not sure if it was received. I'll add that the problem seems to follow a pattern where it happens only twice after a reboot (usually in the morning when rsync runs) and then

Re: Fwd: aac0 issues, Controller is no longer running

Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Adam, Adam McDougall wrote: [...] I've been having issues with the aac0 driver with a Sun STK raid card ( Adaptec 5805 ). After FBSD upgrades and a reboot, it will lock up when rsync backups run at night. After doing

Re: 7.2 dies in zfs

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:36:43AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in

Re: 7.2 dies in zfs

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:00:03AM +0100, Svein Skogen (listmail account) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam McDougall wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:36:43AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:07:40PM +0100, Johan Hendriks

Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64

I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd. delivery is via procmail which doesn't touch the dovecot metadata and webmail uses

Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64

On 11/29/10 20:35, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi, Adam-- On Nov 29, 2010, at 5:06 PM, Adam McDougall wrote: I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over

Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64

On 11/30/10 02:49, Doug Barton wrote: On 11/29/2010 17:06, Adam McDougall wrote: I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd

Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64

On 11/30/10 09:33, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, November 29, 2010 8:06:54 pm Adam McDougall wrote: I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over

Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64

On 11/30/10 08:33, Rick Macklem wrote: I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers (usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd. delivery is via procmail which doesn't touch the

Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 06:33:06PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: I'll give negnametimeo=0 a try on one server starting tonight, I'll be busy tomorrow and don't want to risk making anything potentially worse than it is yet. I can't figure out how to disable the attr cache in FreeBSD.

Re: Stale NFS file handles on 8.x amd64

On 12/04/10 18:39, Adam McDougall wrote: On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 06:33:06PM -0500, Rick Macklem (and others) wrote: (various suggestions) I had to call off the experimentation with live users and resorted to running all IMAP connections from a single NFS client for now. I was causing

Re: 8-STABLE/amd64 semi-regular crash with kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled in process 12 (swi4: clock)

On 01/20/11 03:05, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Eugene. You wrote 19 января 2011 г., 12:50:25: Yes, I've missed it's PRERELEASE already. Backtrace points to the problem in em_local_timer() fixed in CURRENT 7 days ago, take a look:

Re: about thumper aka sun fire x4500

On 01/17/12 17:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:59:08PM +0100, peter h wrote: I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and 8.2 Both fails when i engage 10 disks, the system craches and messages : Hyper transport sync flood will get into the BIOS

Re: Load when idl on stable

On 06/05/12 15:37, Albert Shih wrote: Le 03/06/2012 ? 23:55:06+0200, Oliver Pinter a écrit I think, this is the old thread: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/High-load-event-idl-td5671431.html Yes. But because I didn't find any solution, I resent the problem. The interrupt rerouting

Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP

On 06/15/12 12:19, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, Maybe there is a simple answer, but how do I bind a route to a network interface in 8-stable? Is that possible at all? I'm asking because the routes I add in my network setup are lost because of ARP packet drops. I.E. they exist for a while, but

Re: How go back from X.Y-RELEASE-pZ to X.Y-RELEASE?

On 11/23/2012 6:22 AM, Peter Olsson wrote: We are currently using cvs for both source and ports. I have begun changing to portsnap for ports, and I would also like to try changing at least some of our servers to freebsd-update. But all servers have been patched, using either RELENG_8_3 or

Samsung SSD 840 PRO fails to probe

Hello, My co-worker ordered a Samsung 840 PRO series SSD for his desktop but we found 9.0-rel would not probe it and 9.1-rc3 shows some errors. I got past the problem with a workaround of disabling AHCI mode in the BIOS which drops it to IDE mode and it detects fine, although runs a little

Re: Samsung SSD 840 PRO fails to probe

On 11/26/12 14:27, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. On 26.11.2012 20:51, Adam McDougall wrote: My co-worker ordered a Samsung 840 PRO series SSD for his desktop but we found 9.0-rel would not probe it and 9.1-rc3 shows some errors. I got past the problem with a workaround of disabling AHCI mode

Re: time issues and ZFS

On 01/22/13 07:27, Julian Stecklina wrote: Thus spake Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il: In the meantime here is some info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645: running with no problems LAPIC(600) HPET(450) HPET1(440) HPET2(440) HPET3(440) i8254(100) RTC(0) Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550: this is the

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 - openldap slapd lockups, mutex problems

On 01/22/13 05:19, Kai Gallasch wrote: Hi. (Im am sending this to the stable list, because it maybe kernel related.. ) On 9.1-RELEASE I am witnessing lockups of the openldap slapd daemon. The slapd runs for some days and then hangs, consuming high amounts of CPU. In this state slapd can only

Re: Why does poudriere always rebuild nginx and GraphicsMagick13?

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:37:19AM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 12.02.2013 um 23:11 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote: Hi, poudriere 2.2 here, running on 9.1-amd64 Of the 730-ish ports,

Re: 9.1-stable: ATI IXP600 AHCI: CAM timeout

On 05/29/13 10:21, Oliver Fromme wrote: Steven Hartland wrote: Have you checked your sata cables and psu outputs? Both of these could be the underlying cause of poor signalling. I can't easily check that because it is a cheap rented server in a remote location. But I don't

Re: ZFS pool with 4k sector size

On 08/22/13 04:23, Trond Endrestøl wrote: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:40+0400, Michael BlackHeart wrote: Hello, I'd like to know what is the best way to convert my pool from 512b sector size to 4k sector size. Hardware: 2 x2Tb WD Green with 4k physical sector size Model Family: Western Digital

Re: Is there a linux_base available for RELENG_9?

On 03/09/2015 20:44, Chris H wrote: I performed av svn update for both src (r279796), and ports (r380829) last night. building/installing world/kernel, went as one would hope. Upgrading ports was a different story. Given this box has an nVidia card. I usually start by upgrading

Re: SSH hung with an OpenSSH_6.6.1p1 -- OpenSSH_5.8p2_hpn13v11

On 03/26/2015 21:25, Wu ShuKun wrote: Okay % ssh -v -o KexAlgorithms diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 10.41.172.19 OpenSSH_6.6.1p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1l-freebsd 15 Jan 2015 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Connecting to 10.41.172.19 [10.41.172.19] port 22. debug1:

Re: ports/base ntpd rc.d script with WITHOUT_NTP=yes

On 04/08/2015 12:48, Matt Smith wrote: Hi, I just upgraded my server to 10.1-STABLE r281264 and when I ran mergemaster it told me that /etc/rc.d/ntpd was stale and would I like to delete it. It's never done this before. I've figured out it's because I have WITHOUT_NTP=yes in /etc/src.conf.

Re: Getting going with a new Dell 7810

On 06/16/2015 12:55, Richard Kuhns wrote: Greetings all, I've just received a new Dell Precision 7810. I've installed FreeBSD 10.1 (UEFI boot), checked out sources, built world kernel and am now running r284449. So far, so good. The problem is Xorg. I'm running the latest Xorg in ports;

Re: 4TB Western Digital My Book 1230 USB hard drive not working on 10.2

On 08/02/2015 21:22, Paul Mather wrote: I have a 4TB external USB drive (Western Digital My Book 1230) that I am trying to use under FreeBSD/amd64 10.2 (10.2-PRERELEASE #0 r286052: Wed Jul 29 20:59:39 EDT 2015). This system has a MSI 760GMA-P34 (FX) motherboard. The drive probes

Re: [CTF] pkg 1.6.0

On 09/22/2015 03:20, Ranjan1018 . wrote: > 2015-09-21 23:27 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin : > >> Hi all, >> >> We are about to release pkg 1.6.0. pkg-devel has been updated to 1.5.99.13 >> aka >> 1.6.0 rc3 that we hope will become the new pkg 1.6.0 btw the end of the >> Week >>

Re: Hangs with mrsas?

On 03/07/2016 14:09, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I have a new Dell server with a typical Dell hardware RAID. pciconf > identifies it as "MegaRAID SAS-3 3008 [Fury]"; mfiutil reports: > > mfi0 Adapter: > Product Name: PERC H330 Adapter >Serial Number: 5AT00PI > Firmware: 25.3.0.0016

Boot hang on Xen after r318347/(310418)

Hello, Recently I made a new build of 11-STABLE but encountered a boot hang at this state: http://www.egr.msu.edu/~mcdouga9/pics/r318347-smp-hang.png It is easy to reproduce, I can just boot from any 11 or 12 ISO that contains the commit. I compiled various svn revisions to confirm that

Re: Boot hang on Xen after r318347/(310418)

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:33:07PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Recently I made a new build of 11-STABLE but encountered a boot hang > > at this state: > > http://www.egr.m

Re: Boot hang on Xen after r318347/(310418)

On 05/25/2017 09:28, Adam McDougall wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:33:07PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Recently I made a new build of 11-STABLE but encountered

Re: nfs lockd errors after NetApp software upgrade.

Try changing bool_t do_tcp = FALSE; to TRUE in /usr/src/sys/nlm/nlm_prot_impl.c, recompile the kernel and try again. I think this makes it match Linux client behavior. I suspect I ran into the same issue as you. I do think I used nolockd is a workaround temporarily. I can provide some more details

Re: nfs lockd errors after NetApp software upgrade.

On 12/22/19 12:01 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Well, I've noted the flawed protocol. Here's an example (from my limited > understanding of these protocols, where there has never been a published > spec) : > - The NLM supports a "blocking lock request" that goes something like this... >- client