Re: Last openssl update brakes localhost email sending

Hello! I'm curious... Why is localhost delivery encrypted by default in the first place? I have this in /etc/mail/access: # # Disable local encrypted connections: Srv_Features:localhost S #

Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?

John Marshall john.marsh...@riverwillow.com.au wrote: I also note that phk@ was working on an ntp client which he hoped to offer as a replacement but that is presumably not ready yet. I also note that we have current versions of ntp available in ports; but I'm talking about what we ship in

Re: zfs, a directory that used to hold lot of files and listing pause

Scott Bennett wrote: > thousand blocks allocated. Directories don't shrink. Directory entries do > not get moved around within directories when files are added or deleted. > Directories can remain the same length or they can grow in length. If a > directory once had many tens

Re: Freebsd 11 - /usr/bin missing [xl]zgrep/zegrep/zfgrep

Freddie Cash wrote: > ​Huh, never even noticed (not that I use many of the grep variants). But, > on a 10.3 install (from binaries, not source), half the variants are > hard-links to bsdgrep, while the other half are hard-links to grep: Yep, that's how it was for me. >

Freebsd 11 - /usr/bin missing [xl]zgrep/zegrep/zfgrep

I've just noticed that the hard links for xzgrep / xzegrep / xzfgrep / lzgrep / lzgrep / lzfgrep are missing from my source-built FreeBSD 11 release. I've tracked it down to a commit almost 2 years ago.. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.bin/grep/Makefile?r1=277939=284345=315687 Am I

Re: Freebsd 11 - /usr/bin missing [xl]zgrep/zegrep/zfgrep

Kyle Evans wrote: > > > > Am I really the first to notice, or am I missing something here? > > Yes, but only slightly. =) If you do `grep -V`, you should find that > your system is actually using GNU grep. Please refer to: >

Re: Freebsd 11 - /usr/bin missing [xl]zgrep/zegrep/zfgrep

Kyle Evans wrote: > Ah, I see what you mean. I've no idea on the history here, but I > believe the idea is that if I invoke one of these other links (zgrep, > egrep, ...) I'm expecting it to be actually be grep(1) based purely on > the name, and I don't consider bsdgrep(1) to

Re: Rising amounts of crap on this mailing list

> Anyway, in this case, there should be options for the moderators to block > certain servers, addresses and users. Whilst I agree, the thing that makes my use of these lists less effective is the indiscriminate top posting and even worse, the total lack of reply-trimming. Cheers, Jamie

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

Remember, it's not simply deprecating cards less than 1Gig. I have a card that is 10/100 only, but works fine with the gigabit alc driver: alc0: port 0x2000-0x207f mem 0xe050-0xe053 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 cheers, jamie ___

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:22PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > > Remember, it's not simply deprecating cards less than 1Gig. > > > > I have a card that is 10/100 only, but works fine with the gigabit alc > > driver: > >

Error in /usr/src/UPDATING regarding drm

/usr/src/UPDATING contains the line: "WITHOUT_DRM_MODULE=t and WITHOUT_DRM2_MODULE=t to avoid nasty" This should be: WITHOUT_MODULE_DRM and WITHOUT_MODULE_DRM2=t to /etc/src.conf to avoid nasty" (I also added the reference to /etc/src.conf which I think is missing) cheers, Jamie

Replicable file-system corruption due to fsck/ufs

I've noticed a replicable disk corruption by fsck_ufs/ffs on sparse files. This is on amd/64 12-stable-20190409, but I first noticed it on 12-stable-20190326. I didn't notice it on my previous build of 12-stable-20190107, but I may not have had any relevant sparse files at the time, so I don't

Re: Replicable file-system corruption due to fsck/ufs

Kirk McKusick wrote: > > From: Peter Holm > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 04:13:00PM -0700, Kirk McKusick wrote: > > > >> This is indeed a bug in the calculation of the location of the last > >> block of a file. I believe that the following patch to head will > >> fix it. > >> > >> Peter,

Re: missing date from version

Daniel Braniss wrote: > Hi, > I just compiled r355429 for amd64, and noticed that the compilation date is > missing from ‘name -a’. > FreeBSD hp-600 12.1-STABLE FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE r353429 HUJI amd64 > > there is a now (maybe for a long time?) a -R option to newvers.sh. > is there an option

Re: assfail

Andy Farkas wrote: > Just still wondering what 'assfail' could be. Don't google it!! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to