On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>
>> It may have gone in before the RELENG_8_1 tag/branch occurred? SVN
>> r209309
>>
>> Jacks's change went into stable/8 on June 18:
>>
>
> Also, did anyone provide feedback on SVN r209959 to
> head/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c ?
>
> It's s
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Steve Polyack wrote:
> On 07/15/10 13:31, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> It may have gone in before the RELENG_8_1 tag/branch occurred? SVN
>>>&
On Jul 25, 2012, at 11:45 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a problem with 9-stable and sctp since the 20 july (seems
> related to SVN rev 238613 on 2012-07-19 09:32:59Z by tuexen) :
>
> If I put this date in my csup config file:
> src-all tag=RELENG_9 "date=2012.07.19.00.0
On Jul 25, 2012, at 11:45 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a problem with 9-stable and sctp since the 20 july (seems
> related to SVN rev 238613 on 2012-07-19 09:32:59Z by tuexen) :
>
> If I put this date in my csup config file:
> src-all tag=RELENG_9 "date=2012.07.19.00.0
> On 13. Aug 2017, at 01:08, Mikhail T. wrote:
>
> Just my luck -- deciding to update to the latest 10.x today...
> sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c:280:50: error: implicit conversion from 'long
> long' to 'time_t' (aka 'int') changes value from -9223372036854775808 to 0
> [-Werror,-Wconstant-convers
