make world broken for RELENG_6

, thanks, -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: make world broken for RELENG_6

caused the problem to go away. Thanks, guys! -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cd ripping to flac

with FreeBSD-stable? This question is better asked on freebsd-questions. Since cdda2wav is in the base, I suppose people use it regurarly. Something like: What do you mean by base? It is a port and not in the base system. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd

Re: TCP differences in 7.2 vs 7.1

. This option controls whether we offload segmenting to the NIC. My NIC seemed to be limited by the number of interrupts which could be delivered. You can also do this on a card-by-card basis using ifconfig interface -tso. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd

Re: make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC fails

a buildkernel, as the toolchain which builds the kernel might have changed. Also KERNCONF=GENERIC is implied. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: Use n instead of Fn for choosing the OS when booting?

choices, maximum. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: What is /boot/kernel/*.symbols?

sparc64 systems running -current with symbols and the size of /boot/kernel is more comparable to i386, even with the 8-byte pointer size: Um, probably there are a lot of devices on amd64 that aren't available for sparc64? -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd

Re: What is /boot/kernel/*.symbols?

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:24:51AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote: On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Rick C. Petty typed: On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote: On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:46:50AM +0200, Dimitry Andric typed: Right, so it's a lot bigger

Re: ataraid's revenge! (Was: Re: A nasty ataraid experience.)

slick on disk1. 11). Add disk1 to the gmirror, which should start a sync. 12). Load the geom_vinum module again, if you have other volumes not part of this mirror. If this panics the kernel, or if the kernel panicked after step 11, a normal restart might be successful. -- Rick C. Petty

Re: newfs(8) parameters from dumpfs -m have bad -s value?

patches for dumpfs and newfs to both add the raw byte size and the 512-byte sector size handling to correct said mistake, unless someone else would rather. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

or just: make -j4 buildworld kernel echo success -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: newfs(8) parameters from dumpfs -m have bad -s value?

and then divided by the actual sector size when calling bwrite(3). I still would prefer: Better yet would be to add a parameter (-z perhaps) to newfs(8) to accept number of bytes instead of multiples of sectorsize. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable

Re: SMART

._attributes If not, could you make the changes on wikipedia? This isn't a FreeBSD-specific topic, and the larger community would benefit from such documentation. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Why is NFSv4 so slow?

these tunables explicitly set: kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=524288 vfs.newnfs.issue_delegations=1 On the client, I just have the maxsockbuf setting (this is twice the default value). I'm open to trying other tunables or patches. TIA, -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

, I discovered that my client already had /vol/a/b and /vol/a/c directories (because pre-NFSv4, I had to mount each filesystem separately). Once I removed those empty dirs and remounted, the problem went away. But it did drive me crazy for a few hours. -- Rick C. Petty

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

|| * 7660 Again, my ports tree is mounted as FSType nfs with option nfsv4. FreeBSD/amd64 8.1-PRERELEASE r208408M GENERIC kernel. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

constantly and no console output. It's possible the NICs are all suspect, but all of this worked fine a couple of days ago when I was only using NFSv3. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

client, when noticing the mounting-over-directories problem: NLM: failed to contact remote rpcbind, stat = 5, port = 28416 nfsv4 client/server protocol prob err=10020 nfsv4 client/server protocol prob err=10020 ... No other related messages were found in /var/log/messages either. -- -- Rick C

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

I reboot. I'm building new worlds/kernels now to see if that makes any difference. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

jittery. I can try it again with v3 client and v4 server, if you think that's worthy of pursuit. If it makes any difference, the server's four CPUs are pegged at 100% (running nice +4 cpu-bound jobs). But that was the case before I enabled v4 server too. -- Rick C. Petty

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:09:21PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Rick C. Petty wrote: If it makes any difference, the server's four CPUs are pegged at 100% (running nice +4 cpu-bound jobs). But that was the case before I enabled v4 server too. If it is practical

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

times, since I don't need some of those tools. I'm okay with the messages though; I'll probably comment out WITHOUT_INET6. Thanks again for your suggestions, -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

, Rick, for all your hard work! -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow? (root/toor)

change this behavior yet. -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

44069 38 cpu1: timer 2293983 1998 Total4935757 4299 Any ideas? -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:44:06AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Hi. I'm still having problems with NFSv4 being very laggy on one client. When the NFSv4 server is at 50% idle CPU and the disks are 1% busy, I am getting horrible throughput on an idle client. Using dd(1) with 1 MB block

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

guess I will have to wait for you to bring the v4 client up to date. Thanks again for all of your contributions and for porting NFSv4 to FreeBSD! -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

*that* much overhead... -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

mounts are slower than plain nfs, and sometimes orders of magnitude slower (as others have shown). But the old nfs is so broken in other ways that I'd prefer slower yet more stable. Thanks again for all your help, Rick! -- Rick C. Petty ___ freebsd-stable