Re: Any vital post 6.0 fixes gone into stable ?

2005-12-13 Thread Holger Kipp
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:21:29PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:03:59 +0100, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm about to start installing a whole new set of machines for production use with 6.0 on them. Normally I would just use -RELEASE, but as this is a

RE: Any vital post 6.0 fixes gone into stable ?

2005-12-12 Thread Daniel Eriksson
Pete French wrote: I havent seen anything go past which I regard as critical, though somebody did make a mention of some arp problem being fixed, which I could find a reference to the original problem for. The ARP problem is not in -RELEASE, it was introduced in -STABLE and fixed a day

RE: Any vital post 6.0 fixes gone into stable ?

2005-12-12 Thread Pete French
The ARP problem is not in -RELEASE, it was introduced in -STABLE and fixed a day later. Ah, O.K. thanks -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Any vital post 6.0 fixes gone into stable ?

2005-12-12 Thread Ronald Klop
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:03:59 +0100, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm about to start installing a whole new set of machines for production use with 6.0 on them. Normally I would just use -RELEASE, but as this is a dot-nought release I was wondering if there is anything vital which has