On 25.04.21 11:15, dashdruid via freebsd-stable wrote:
Hello,
I have reinstalled it with GPT/ZFS and your right it's much better. Same search
taking 3-6 seconds so I have deleted now all my old UFS based FreeBSD images.
If the partitioning alone changed something it was probably an
> Am 24.04.2021 um 15:03 schrieb Jeff Love :
>
> I'm running 12.2 and 13.0 on KVM using virtio and zfs. I am not having disk
> I/O issues.
UFS or ZFS does not make a difference for me.
ZFS is faster on read due to compression - that’s why back in the XenServer
days I didn’t even realize it
Hello,
I have reinstalled it with GPT/ZFS and your right it's much better. Same search
taking 3-6 seconds so I have deleted now all my old UFS based FreeBSD images.
I wonder how I didn't notice this earlier because I had 12.0, 12.2 base images
and now that I retested them they had the exact
I'm running 12.2 and 13.0 on KVM using virtio and zfs. I am not having
disk I/O issues.
Jeff Love
On 4/24/21 5:25 AM, dashdruid via freebsd-stable wrote:
Hello List,
I hope some other folks out there running FreeBSD on KVM as well. I set up a
base VM while doing so I noticed that the disk
> I hope some other folks out there running FreeBSD on KVM as well. I set
up a base VM while doing so I noticed that the disk operations are very
slow. Many times I edit a file in vim or try to run a command there is a
huge lag.
I noticed this on Ramnode--my VPS--and tech support there has told
We have over 50 FreeBSD VM on KVM for years, several Proxmox (5x,6x) and
Centos (6.x,7.x) servers, and never experienced performance problem like
this.
Your example on fresh new 13 VM:
# time -p find / -name cacert.pem
real 0.28
user 0.00
sys 0.13
12.2 our syslog server:
# time -p find /
> Am 24.04.2021 um 11:25 schrieb dashdruid via freebsd-stable
> :
>
> Hello List,
>
> I hope some other folks out there running FreeBSD on KVM as well. I set up a
> base VM while doing so I noticed that the disk operations are very slow. Many
> times I edit a file in vim or try to run a
