On 20.11.2018 23:45, Mark Johnston wrote:
>> Where is other 11G of memory?!
>>
>> I've checked USED and FREE in "vmstat -z" output and got this:
>>
>> $ vmstat -z | tr : , | awk -F , '1{print $2*$4,$2*$5,$1}' | sort -n |
>> tail -20
>> 23001088 9171456 MAP ENTRY
>> 29680800 8404320 VM OBJECT
>>
Hello Eugene,
Wednesday, November 21, 2018, 5:19:32 PM, you wrote:
>> It is more likely that there is a bug in "priority" for memory
>> distribution: abd FREE memory has higher priority than ARC somehow.
> OTOH, if "abd_chunks" part of ZFS ARC is not released to the UMA
> from which it was
21.11.2018 21:03, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>>> And here top consumers. I don't like that most of te memory is in FREE
>>> abd_chunks - 8GB!
>>>
>>> USED (b) FREE (b) NAME
>>> 531902464 8392536064 abd_chunk
>> This may be a leak. Can you monitor this value for longer run?
> No problem.
>
> But I
Hello Eugene,
Wednesday, November 21, 2018, 4:23:29 PM, you wrote:
>> And here top consumers. I don't like that most of te memory is in FREE
>> abd_chunks - 8GB!
>>
>> USED (b) FREE (b) NAME
>> 531902464 8392536064 abd_chunk
> This may be a leak. Can you monitor this value for longer run?
No
21.11.2018 18:34, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> And here top consumers. I don't like that most of te memory is in FREE
> abd_chunks - 8GB!
>
> USED (b) FREE (b) NAME
> 531902464 8392536064 abd_chunk
This may be a leak. Can you monitor this value for longer run?
Hello Lev,
Wednesday, November 21, 2018, 1:56:18 PM, you wrote:
>> Could you show the output of "vmstat -s" when in this state?
> Now ARC is 1.9GB (!!!) and 15G is still Wired:
> % vmstat -s
> 1311134466 cpu context switches
> 2126950424 device interrupts
> 45414140 software interrupts
>
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, November 20, 2018, 11:45:37 PM, you wrote:
> Could you show the output of "vmstat -s" when in this state?
Now ARC is 1.9GB (!!!) and 15G is still Wired:
% vmstat -s
1311134466 cpu context switches
2126950424 device interrupts
45414140 software interrupts
103215017 traps
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:42:24PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
> I have server which is mostly torrent box. It uses ZFS and equipped
> with 16GiB of physical memory. It is running 11-STABLE (r339914 now).
>
> I've updated it to r339914 from some 11.1-STABLE revision 3 weeks ago.
>
> I
Hello,
20.11.2018 15:42, Lev Serebryakov пишет:
I have server which is mostly torrent box. It uses ZFS and equipped
with 16GiB of physical memory. It is running 11-STABLE (r339914 now).
I've updated it to r339914 from some 11.1-STABLE revision 3 weeks ago.
I was used to see 13-14GiB of
